Verification of Differences in Review Evaluation and Information Behavioral Intentions Based on the Negative Reviewer's Rating Tendencies

The purpose of this study is to identify the effects of the gap in online review ratings(defined as the difference between a reviewer’s past average rating and the general public’s average rating) on consumers' perceptions of review helpfulness and credibility, as well as their intentions for further information search and booking. To achieve this objective, data were collected through a scenario-based experimental design, and a total of 126 samples were used for the final analysis. As a result of the analysis, First, after the exposure to information regarding the review rating gap, credibility significantly increased in Groups 1 and 3. In terms of booking intention, a significant decrease was observed in Groups 1 and 2. Second, a significant difference was found in the degree of change in booking intention between Groups 1 and 3, as well as between Groups 2 and 3. Third, significant differences were observed in the perceived usefulness and credibility of individual reviewers’ ratings of hotels, depending on the level of the review rating gap. Based on findings, theoretical and practical implications were discussed.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hotel & Resort
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62532/khrc.2025.06.24.3.75
Primary Topic
Digital Marketing and Social Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Verification of Differences in Review Evaluation and Information Behavioral Intentions Based on the Negative Reviewer's Rating Tendencies

Journal of Hotel & Resort
Digital Marketing and Social Media
article

Verification of Differences in Review Evaluation and Information Behavioral Intentions Based on the Negative Reviewer's Rating Tendencies

article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the effects of the gap in online review ratings(defined as the difference between a reviewer’s past average rating and the general public’s average rating) on consumers' perceptions of review helpfulness and credibility, as well as their intentions for further information search and booking. To achieve this objective, data were collected through a scenario-based experimental design, and a total of 126 samples were used for the final analysis. As a result of the analysis, First, after the exposure to information regarding the review rating gap, credibility significantly increased in Groups 1 and 3. In terms of booking intention, a significant decrease was observed in Groups 1 and 2. Second, a significant difference was found in the degree of change in booking intention between Groups 1 and 3, as well as between Groups 2 and 3. Third, significant differences were observed in the perceived usefulness and credibility of individual reviewers’ ratings of hotels, depending on the level of the review rating gap. Based on findings, theoretical and practical implications were discussed.

Journal of Hotel & ResortVol. 24(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Digital Marketing and Social Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.