Binding Strength,\nNot Valency, Dictates Accumulation\nand Penetration of Affinity Targeted Macromolecules into Solid Tumors

The efficacy of tumor-targeted therapeutics, engineered\nto engage\nspecific cellular receptors to promote accumulation and penetration,\nis strongly influenced by the carrier’s affinity for its target\nand the valency of binding molecules incorporated into the carrier.\nPrevious research has primarily focused on improving targeting by\naugmenting the number of binding proteins on the carrier, inadvertently\nraising avidity without isolating the individual effects of binding\nstrength and valency. Herein, we precisely evaluate the impact of\nmultivalency on tumor targeting with a recombinant approach to independently\ncontrol valency, avidity, and size. Our findings reveal that constructs\nwith equivalent binding strength exhibit comparable receptor engagement\nand tumor extravasation, regardless of valency. Moreover, excessive\navidity adversely affected tumor accumulation and penetration, with\nthe highest-avidity construct showing diminished exposure. These results\nindicate that overall binding strength, not valency, is the primary\ndeterminant of tumor targeting, providing valuable insights for designing\neffective macromolecular drug carriers.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.4c01303.s001
Primary Topic
Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Binding Strength,\nNot Valency, Dictates Accumulation\nand Penetration of Affinity Targeted Macromolecules into Solid Tumors

Figshare
Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
article

Binding Strength,\nNot Valency, Dictates Accumulation\nand Penetration of Affinity Targeted Macromolecules into Solid Tumors

article en

Abstract

The efficacy of tumor-targeted therapeutics, engineered\nto engage\nspecific cellular receptors to promote accumulation and penetration,\nis strongly influenced by the carrier’s affinity for its target\nand the valency of binding molecules incorporated into the carrier.\nPrevious research has primarily focused on improving targeting by\naugmenting the number of binding proteins on the carrier, inadvertently\nraising avidity without isolating the individual effects of binding\nstrength and valency. Herein, we precisely evaluate the impact of\nmultivalency on tumor targeting with a recombinant approach to independently\ncontrol valency, avidity, and size. Our findings reveal that constructs\nwith equivalent binding strength exhibit comparable receptor engagement\nand tumor extravasation, regardless of valency. Moreover, excessive\navidity adversely affected tumor accumulation and penetration, with\nthe highest-avidity construct showing diminished exposure. These results\nindicate that overall binding strength, not valency, is the primary\ndeterminant of tumor targeting, providing valuable insights for designing\neffective macromolecular drug carriers.

Figshare
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Binding Strength,\nNot Valency, Dictates Accumulation\nand Penetration of Affinity Targeted Macromolecules into Solid Tumors · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS