Analytical\nQuality Evaluation of the Tox21 Compound\nLibrary

The analytical quality of compounds subjected to high-throughput screening (HTS) impacts\naccurate interpretation of assay results, with poor quality samples\npotentially leading to false negatives or positives. The Tox21 “10K”\nlibrary consists of over 8900 unique compounds, spanning a diverse\nlandscape of environmental and pharmaceutical chemicals, posing opportunities\nand challenges for analytical quality control (QC) determinations.\nTox21 sample plates stored in DMSO at ambient conditions for 0 (T0)\nand/or 4 months (T4), totaling more than 13K unique sample identifiers\n(Tox21 IDs), were subjected to various analyses, including liquid\nand gas chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS, GC-MS) and nuclear\nmagnetic resonance (NMR). Results for each sample at T0 or T4 underwent\nexpert review and, where possible, a QC grade conveying purity, identity,\nand concentration was assigned. Herein, we relate details of the methods\napplied and report on the original (v0) Tox21 ID level results. Thirteen\nQC grades were condensed to 5 quality scores to aid global analysis,\nresulting in reinterpretation and improvement of >700 sample grades.\nOf the 92% T0 samples successfully graded, 76% exceeded 90% purity.\nFor 76% of samples that were also tested at T4, 89% showed no evidence\nof sample loss or degradation. Prioritized quality bins were used\nto summarize thousands of replicate sample-level QC results to a compound-level\nQC score to support structure-based analyses. ToxPrint chemotype analysis\nidentified structural features enriched in unstable compounds, as\nwell as in high and low quality T0 subsets. Predicted vapor pressure\nwas weakly correlated with low-concentration QC indicators, reflecting\nlikely entanglement with method amenability and quality issues. Finally,\nan ongoing EPA effort to re-evaluate the original QC spectra is generating\ninsights that will further modify QC grades. Tox21 QC spectra and\nresults will be made available in a new public QC browser, facilitating\nfurther evaluation to support HTS interpretation and modeling applications.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00330.s001
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analytical\nQuality Evaluation of the Tox21 Compound\nLibrary

Figshare
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
article

Analytical\nQuality Evaluation of the Tox21 Compound\nLibrary

article en

Abstract

The analytical quality of compounds subjected to high-throughput screening (HTS) impacts\naccurate interpretation of assay results, with poor quality samples\npotentially leading to false negatives or positives. The Tox21 “10K”\nlibrary consists of over 8900 unique compounds, spanning a diverse\nlandscape of environmental and pharmaceutical chemicals, posing opportunities\nand challenges for analytical quality control (QC) determinations.\nTox21 sample plates stored in DMSO at ambient conditions for 0 (T0)\nand/or 4 months (T4), totaling more than 13K unique sample identifiers\n(Tox21 IDs), were subjected to various analyses, including liquid\nand gas chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS, GC-MS) and nuclear\nmagnetic resonance (NMR). Results for each sample at T0 or T4 underwent\nexpert review and, where possible, a QC grade conveying purity, identity,\nand concentration was assigned. Herein, we relate details of the methods\napplied and report on the original (v0) Tox21 ID level results. Thirteen\nQC grades were condensed to 5 quality scores to aid global analysis,\nresulting in reinterpretation and improvement of >700 sample grades.\nOf the 92% T0 samples successfully graded, 76% exceeded 90% purity.\nFor 76% of samples that were also tested at T4, 89% showed no evidence\nof sample loss or degradation. Prioritized quality bins were used\nto summarize thousands of replicate sample-level QC results to a compound-level\nQC score to support structure-based analyses. ToxPrint chemotype analysis\nidentified structural features enriched in unstable compounds, as\nwell as in high and low quality T0 subsets. Predicted vapor pressure\nwas weakly correlated with low-concentration QC indicators, reflecting\nlikely entanglement with method amenability and quality issues. Finally,\nan ongoing EPA effort to re-evaluate the original QC spectra is generating\ninsights that will further modify QC grades. Tox21 QC spectra and\nresults will be made available in a new public QC browser, facilitating\nfurther evaluation to support HTS interpretation and modeling applications.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analytical\nQuality Evaluation of the Tox21 Compound\nLibrary · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS