AI-Powered systematic reviews in public and occupational health: Opportunities and ethical challenges

The exponential growth of scientific literature presents significant challenges for researchers conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, particularly in public and occupational health. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers transformative potential to streamline these processes by expediting literature screening, enhancing data extraction, and identifying critical evidence with unprecedented efficiency. This commentary explores the opportunities presented by AI in addressing these challenges, including its ability to manage large datasets, uncover hidden associations, and support rapid evidence synthesis for policymaking and clinical practice. While the benefits of AI are substantial, its integration into systematic reviews is not without challenges. Issues such as algorithmic bias, transparency, and the need for robust human oversight remain critical concerns. The commentary highlights these ethical and technical challenges and underscores the importance of standardized guidelines and interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure reliability and quality in AI-assisted research. By addressing these challenges, AI can advance evidence-based practices in public and occupational health, fostering innovation and improving health outcomes globally.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69088/2025/pwrd2
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-Powered systematic reviews in public and occupational health: Opportunities and ethical challenges

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

AI-Powered systematic reviews in public and occupational health: Opportunities and ethical challenges

article en

Abstract

The exponential growth of scientific literature presents significant challenges for researchers conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, particularly in public and occupational health. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers transformative potential to streamline these processes by expediting literature screening, enhancing data extraction, and identifying critical evidence with unprecedented efficiency. This commentary explores the opportunities presented by AI in addressing these challenges, including its ability to manage large datasets, uncover hidden associations, and support rapid evidence synthesis for policymaking and clinical practice. While the benefits of AI are substantial, its integration into systematic reviews is not without challenges. Issues such as algorithmic bias, transparency, and the need for robust human oversight remain critical concerns. The commentary highlights these ethical and technical challenges and underscores the importance of standardized guidelines and interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure reliability and quality in AI-assisted research. By addressing these challenges, AI can advance evidence-based practices in public and occupational health, fostering innovation and improving health outcomes globally.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AI-Powered systematic reviews in public and occupational health: Opportunities and ethical challenges · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS