How does Data Aggregation Impact Elasticity of Substitution Estimation? Evidence from a New Elasticity Database

This paper uses a new elasticity of substitution database, estimated with variation in trade costs, to compare elasticities across different levels of data aggregation and regression types. We find that the OLS estimates in our database tend to be smaller than the PPML estimates on average. We also find that the magnitude of the elasticities estimated using aggregated data tend to be smaller than the elasticities estimated using disaggregated data. Additionally, we aggregate the disaggregated elasticity estimates with trade weights and compare them to the corresponding elasticities estimated with the aggregated data. The estimates aggregated by trade weight are on average larger than the estimates from the regression on the aggregated data. The estimates from the aggregate data may exhibit heterogeneity bias, implying that the trade-weighted estimates could be a better representation of the elasticities of substitution for aggregated product groups.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Staff Working Papers: U.S. International Trade Commission
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71476/494b-yf28
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How does Data Aggregation Impact Elasticity of Substitution Estimation? Evidence from a New Elasticity Database

1 citations
Staff Working Papers: U.S. International Trade Commission
Global trade and economics
article

How does Data Aggregation Impact Elasticity of Substitution Estimation? Evidence from a New Elasticity Database

article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper uses a new elasticity of substitution database, estimated with variation in trade costs, to compare elasticities across different levels of data aggregation and regression types. We find that the OLS estimates in our database tend to be smaller than the PPML estimates on average. We also find that the magnitude of the elasticities estimated using aggregated data tend to be smaller than the elasticities estimated using disaggregated data. Additionally, we aggregate the disaggregated elasticity estimates with trade weights and compare them to the corresponding elasticities estimated with the aggregated data. The estimates aggregated by trade weight are on average larger than the estimates from the regression on the aggregated data. The estimates from the aggregate data may exhibit heterogeneity bias, implying that the trade-weighted estimates could be a better representation of the elasticities of substitution for aggregated product groups.

Staff Working Papers: U.S. International Trade Commission
United States International Trade Commission (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Global trade and economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How does Data Aggregation Impact Elasticity of Substitution Estimation? Evidence from a New Elasticity Database · Staff Working Papers: U.S. International Trade Commission (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS