Comparative analysis of left atrial volume and strain parameters in hemodialysis vs. peritoneal dialysis patients using four-dimensional automatic quantification technology

Cardiovascular complications remain a leading cause of mortality in patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing dialysis. This study aimed to evaluate differences in left atrial (LA) structure and function between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients using four-dimensional automatic left atrial quantification (4D Auto LAQ) technology. This study included 125 patients with end-stage kidney disease, categorized into hemodialysis (<i>n</i> = 69) and peritoneal dialysis (<i>n</i> = 56) groups. Conventional echocardiography and 4D Auto LAQ were used to assess LA volume and strain parameters. Differences between groups were analyzed. Hemodialysis patients exhibited significantly larger LA minimum volume, maximum volume, pre-atrial contraction volume, and maximum volume index compared to peritoneal dialysis patients (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Conversely, hemodialysis patients had significantly lower LA reservoir circumferential strain (LASr-c) and conduit circumferential strain (LAScd-c) than peritoneal dialysis patients (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). LA ejection fraction (LAEF) correlated positively with LASr-c (<i>r</i> = 0.809). Multivariate regression analysis identified LASr-c as independently associated with dialysis modality and LAEF. Sensitivity analysis confirmed LAEF as an independent determinant of LASr-c. Hemodialysis is associated with increased LA volume and impaired LA function compared to peritoneal dialysis. These findings highlight the importance of LA monitoring in dialysis patients to identify early cardiac dysfunction.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28748339
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of left atrial volume and strain parameters in hemodialysis vs. peritoneal dialysis patients using four-dimensional automatic quantification technology

Figshare
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
article

Comparative analysis of left atrial volume and strain parameters in hemodialysis vs. peritoneal dialysis patients using four-dimensional automatic quantification technology

article en

Abstract

Cardiovascular complications remain a leading cause of mortality in patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing dialysis. This study aimed to evaluate differences in left atrial (LA) structure and function between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients using four-dimensional automatic left atrial quantification (4D Auto LAQ) technology. This study included 125 patients with end-stage kidney disease, categorized into hemodialysis (<i>n</i> = 69) and peritoneal dialysis (<i>n</i> = 56) groups. Conventional echocardiography and 4D Auto LAQ were used to assess LA volume and strain parameters. Differences between groups were analyzed. Hemodialysis patients exhibited significantly larger LA minimum volume, maximum volume, pre-atrial contraction volume, and maximum volume index compared to peritoneal dialysis patients (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Conversely, hemodialysis patients had significantly lower LA reservoir circumferential strain (LASr-c) and conduit circumferential strain (LAScd-c) than peritoneal dialysis patients (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). LA ejection fraction (LAEF) correlated positively with LASr-c (<i>r</i> = 0.809). Multivariate regression analysis identified LASr-c as independently associated with dialysis modality and LAEF. Sensitivity analysis confirmed LAEF as an independent determinant of LASr-c. Hemodialysis is associated with increased LA volume and impaired LA function compared to peritoneal dialysis. These findings highlight the importance of LA monitoring in dialysis patients to identify early cardiac dysfunction.

Figshare
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.