Symbolic analysis of the executive branch from cultural legitimacy in Colombia

This article critically analyzes Title VII —“ On the Executive Branch”— of the 1991 Colombian Constitution through a cultural- sociological lens , grounded in Émile Durkheim's theory of moral cohesion and classical legal positivism . The paper explores whether the normative framework governing the Executive reflects the principles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), particularly in terms of institutional legitimacy , access to public administration , and procedural justice . Furthermore , it examines the alignment between the constitutional roles of the Executive and the Sustainable Development Goals ( SDGs ), with special emphasis on SDG 10 ( reduction of inequalities ), SDG 16 ( strong institutions ), and SDG 17 ( multi-level partnerships ). Through a structural , symbolic , and territorial analysis , this study identifies both the strengths and limitations of the Executive's constitutional design , emphasizing the gap between legal formalism and sociocultural legitimacy .<b>Key words: </b>Constitution, Executive, Human Rights, SDGs, Legitimacy

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29670293
Primary Topic
Environmental law and policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Symbolic analysis of the executive branch from cultural legitimacy in Colombia

Figshare
Environmental law and policy
article

Symbolic analysis of the executive branch from cultural legitimacy in Colombia

article en

Abstract

This article critically analyzes Title VII —“ On the Executive Branch”— of the 1991 Colombian Constitution through a cultural- sociological lens , grounded in Émile Durkheim's theory of moral cohesion and classical legal positivism . The paper explores whether the normative framework governing the Executive reflects the principles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), particularly in terms of institutional legitimacy , access to public administration , and procedural justice . Furthermore , it examines the alignment between the constitutional roles of the Executive and the Sustainable Development Goals ( SDGs ), with special emphasis on SDG 10 ( reduction of inequalities ), SDG 16 ( strong institutions ), and SDG 17 ( multi-level partnerships ). Through a structural , symbolic , and territorial analysis , this study identifies both the strengths and limitations of the Executive's constitutional design , emphasizing the gap between legal formalism and sociocultural legitimacy .<b>Key words: </b>Constitution, Executive, Human Rights, SDGs, Legitimacy

Figshare
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Environmental law and policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Symbolic analysis of the executive branch from cultural legitimacy in Colombia · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS