Does Scandinavian exceptionalism create humane prisons? A comparative analysis of Norwegian and Canadian prisons

The creation of humane prisons is a nearly impossible task, however some countries have been praised for being better at it than the rest. Scandinavian countries have been praised for their humane conditions within their prisons and the success of the prisons applications within their welfare state, leading to the creation of the concept of Scandinavian exceptionalism. This thesis examines the legitimacy of Scandinavian exceptionalism by comparing Halden maximum-security prison in Norway to Millhaven Institution in Canada. The two prisons, while comparable in their goals and types of inmates, are very different in their perception by prison officers, inmates, and the public. Halden Prison is praised for architectural design, training for officers, and programs for offenders, while Millhaven is often critiqued for the same aspects. This study analyses each prison within the context of their respective country’s prison system as a whole. The research also points out the strengths and weaknesses of each prison and how they compare to each other. The study concludes by comparing the two prisons within the context of Scandinavian exceptionalism and offering suggestions of how elements that each prison could learn from each other.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MRU-Repo
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60770/d28y-p584
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Scandinavian exceptionalism create humane prisons? A comparative analysis of Norwegian and Canadian prisons

MRU-Repo
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Does Scandinavian exceptionalism create humane prisons? A comparative analysis of Norwegian and Canadian prisons

article en

Abstract

The creation of humane prisons is a nearly impossible task, however some countries have been praised for being better at it than the rest. Scandinavian countries have been praised for their humane conditions within their prisons and the success of the prisons applications within their welfare state, leading to the creation of the concept of Scandinavian exceptionalism. This thesis examines the legitimacy of Scandinavian exceptionalism by comparing Halden maximum-security prison in Norway to Millhaven Institution in Canada. The two prisons, while comparable in their goals and types of inmates, are very different in their perception by prison officers, inmates, and the public. Halden Prison is praised for architectural design, training for officers, and programs for offenders, while Millhaven is often critiqued for the same aspects. This study analyses each prison within the context of their respective country’s prison system as a whole. The research also points out the strengths and weaknesses of each prison and how they compare to each other. The study concludes by comparing the two prisons within the context of Scandinavian exceptionalism and offering suggestions of how elements that each prison could learn from each other.

MRU-Repo
Mount Royal University (CA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.