Research on penetration depth calculation of anchors dropped into coarse sand and gravel backfill layers for submarine pipelines

ObjectiveDamages caused by dropping ship anchors have become a major factor contributing to third-party damages to submarine pipelines, indirectly affecting the operational safety of underwater structures. Therefore, determination of the penetration depth of dropped anchors into backfill layers using calculation models developed for anchor penetration into various backfill layers is of great significance. MethodsThe influence of backfilling with coarse sand and gravel on penetration depths, focusing on Hall anchors as a case study, was studied using finite element analysis, experimental verification, and empirical formula methods. First, the DNV empirical formulas and numerical simulation methods were applied to calculate the penetration depths of Hall anchors with varying masses into coarse sand and gravel backfill layers. Next, a series of down-scaled physical model experiments for anchor dropping were conducted under the same conditions as those used for analyses with the DNV empirical formulas and numerical simulations based on a full-scale model. The results from the physical model experiments, numerical simulations, and calculations based on the DNV empirical formula were compared and analyzed. ResultsUnder coarse sand conditions, the penetration depth results generated by the three methods were in good agreement. In gravel conditions, the results from numerical simulations and physical model experiments were also in good agreement; however, there was a 45% deviation between the DNV empirical formula and physical model experimental results. Since the DNV empirical formula is primarily based on circular tube dropping experiments, an empirical formula for equivalent front-end contact areas of anchors penetrating into gravel backfill layers was proposed. This formula, incorporating a modified front area factor, can more accurately predict the penetration depth of Hall anchors in gravel, with its calculation results closely aligning to those obtained from physical model experiments. Additionally, regression equations for maximum penetration depths of Hall anchors with different masses in coarse sand and gravel backfill layers were developed through fitting, based on the above calculation results. ConclusionThe research results provide a basis for the design and safety assessment of protection structures for submarine pipelines.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2025.05.009
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on penetration depth calculation of anchors dropped into coarse sand and gravel backfill layers for submarine pipelines

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
article

Research on penetration depth calculation of anchors dropped into coarse sand and gravel backfill layers for submarine pipelines

article en

Abstract

ObjectiveDamages caused by dropping ship anchors have become a major factor contributing to third-party damages to submarine pipelines, indirectly affecting the operational safety of underwater structures. Therefore, determination of the penetration depth of dropped anchors into backfill layers using calculation models developed for anchor penetration into various backfill layers is of great significance. MethodsThe influence of backfilling with coarse sand and gravel on penetration depths, focusing on Hall anchors as a case study, was studied using finite element analysis, experimental verification, and empirical formula methods. First, the DNV empirical formulas and numerical simulation methods were applied to calculate the penetration depths of Hall anchors with varying masses into coarse sand and gravel backfill layers. Next, a series of down-scaled physical model experiments for anchor dropping were conducted under the same conditions as those used for analyses with the DNV empirical formulas and numerical simulations based on a full-scale model. The results from the physical model experiments, numerical simulations, and calculations based on the DNV empirical formula were compared and analyzed. ResultsUnder coarse sand conditions, the penetration depth results generated by the three methods were in good agreement. In gravel conditions, the results from numerical simulations and physical model experiments were also in good agreement; however, there was a 45% deviation between the DNV empirical formula and physical model experimental results. Since the DNV empirical formula is primarily based on circular tube dropping experiments, an empirical formula for equivalent front-end contact areas of anchors penetrating into gravel backfill layers was proposed. This formula, incorporating a modified front area factor, can more accurately predict the penetration depth of Hall anchors in gravel, with its calculation results closely aligning to those obtained from physical model experiments. Additionally, regression equations for maximum penetration depths of Hall anchors with different masses in coarse sand and gravel backfill layers were developed through fitting, based on the above calculation results. ConclusionThe research results provide a basis for the design and safety assessment of protection structures for submarine pipelines.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Tianjin University (CN), Tianjin Municipal Engineering Design and Research Institute (CN), Line Corporation (Japan) (JP), China National Petroleum Corporation (China) (CN)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.