Online platforms, intermediary responsibility, and human rights: digital copyright as a site of multiple contestations in the EU

Whereas once, intermediary immunity from liability in the EU was a question that arose in the context of balancing copyright protection and other human rights, the changing perception of online platforms now means that the question of copyright protection has been subsumed into a broader discussion of the responsibilities of platforms in the offering of their services. This chapter focuses on this changing impetus in platform governance, highlighting the original approach of a balancing of rights including that to conduct a business under case law such as Scarlet v Sabam, before considering how the Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive and Digital Services Act have substantially altered the existing approach. Platforms are no longer considered neutral arbiters performing a content moderation function. Instead, they are perceived as potentially problematic actors in their own rights, with heightened scrutiny of their policies and actions in order to guarantee fundamental rights protections.

Publication Details

Journal
Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Published
2025-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57711/y7hc-rs45
Primary Topic
Copyright and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Online platforms, intermediary responsibility, and human rights: digital copyright as a site of multiple contestations in the EU

Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Copyright and Intellectual Property
article

Online platforms, intermediary responsibility, and human rights: digital copyright as a site of multiple contestations in the EU

article en

Abstract

Whereas once, intermediary immunity from liability in the EU was a question that arose in the context of balancing copyright protection and other human rights, the changing perception of online platforms now means that the question of copyright protection has been subsumed into a broader discussion of the responsibilities of platforms in the offering of their services. This chapter focuses on this changing impetus in platform governance, highlighting the original approach of a balancing of rights including that to conduct a business under case law such as Scarlet v Sabam, before considering how the Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive and Digital Services Act have substantially altered the existing approach. Platforms are no longer considered neutral arbiters performing a content moderation function. Instead, they are perceived as potentially problematic actors in their own rights, with heightened scrutiny of their policies and actions in order to guarantee fundamental rights protections.

Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Copyright and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.