AI in the Workplace: How Managerial Perceptions of AI Shape Expectations and the Performance Evaluation Process

This study investigates how an employee’s use of artificial intelligence (AI) impacts managers' subjective performance evaluations, particularly focusing on how managers' perceptions of AI influence their performance expectations and subsequent evaluations of their employees. Using an experiment manipulating AI reliability perceptions (high vs. low) and performance outcomes (success vs. failure), I predict and find that managers expect higher performance from employees using AI perceived as reliable. Further, consistent with my prediction, I find greater discrepancies between managers' expectations and evaluations when an employee uses unreliable AI and exhibits successful performance. Additionally, successful performance is more often attributed to the employee when AI is seen as unreliable, whereas no significant attributional differences were found for unsuccessful performance. These findings highlight the importance of managers' perceptions of AI in shaping managerial expectations and evaluations.

Publication Details

Journal
Georgia State University Repository
Published
2025-07-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57709/h6m5-7c42
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI in the Workplace: How Managerial Perceptions of AI Shape Expectations and the Performance Evaluation Process

Georgia State University Repository
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

AI in the Workplace: How Managerial Perceptions of AI Shape Expectations and the Performance Evaluation Process

article en

Abstract

This study investigates how an employee’s use of artificial intelligence (AI) impacts managers' subjective performance evaluations, particularly focusing on how managers' perceptions of AI influence their performance expectations and subsequent evaluations of their employees. Using an experiment manipulating AI reliability perceptions (high vs. low) and performance outcomes (success vs. failure), I predict and find that managers expect higher performance from employees using AI perceived as reliable. Further, consistent with my prediction, I find greater discrepancies between managers' expectations and evaluations when an employee uses unreliable AI and exhibits successful performance. Additionally, successful performance is more often attributed to the employee when AI is seen as unreliable, whereas no significant attributional differences were found for unsuccessful performance. These findings highlight the importance of managers' perceptions of AI in shaping managerial expectations and evaluations.

Georgia State University Repository
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.