Compound and incorporation constructions as combinations of unexpandable roots

This paper offers definitions of the terms compound construction, compound and incorporation construction that can be applied to all languages in the same way. The earlier literature has often expressed pessimism about identifying such elements across languages in an objective way, but I propose definitions that do not rely on notions such as “word” or “morphology”. I define incorporation as a special kind of verbal compound construction, and a compound construction as a combination of strictly adjacent roots. Rather than being “non-phrasal”, I say that compounds are defined as being “non-expandable” by modifiers. These definitions are shared-core definitions, like most other definitions of comparative concepts: They capture the core of the types of elements that have been called “compound” and “incorporation” in the earlier literature, but not necessarily every compound and every incorporation in every language. I hope that these definitions show that we do not need to wait for the definitive theory of compound and incorporation constructions before we can provide simple and clear definitions. (Published in 2025 in ZWJW: https://journals.linguistik.de/zwjw/article/view/124)

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8137250
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Compound and incorporation constructions as combinations of unexpandable roots

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
article

Compound and incorporation constructions as combinations of unexpandable roots

article en

Abstract

This paper offers definitions of the terms compound construction, compound and incorporation construction that can be applied to all languages in the same way. The earlier literature has often expressed pessimism about identifying such elements across languages in an objective way, but I propose definitions that do not rely on notions such as “word” or “morphology”. I define incorporation as a special kind of verbal compound construction, and a compound construction as a combination of strictly adjacent roots. Rather than being “non-phrasal”, I say that compounds are defined as being “non-expandable” by modifiers. These definitions are shared-core definitions, like most other definitions of comparative concepts: They capture the core of the types of elements that have been called “compound” and “incorporation” in the earlier literature, but not necessarily every compound and every incorporation in every language. I hope that these definitions show that we do not need to wait for the definitive theory of compound and incorporation constructions before we can provide simple and clear definitions. (Published in 2025 in ZWJW: https://journals.linguistik.de/zwjw/article/view/124)

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Compound and incorporation constructions as combinations of unexpandable roots · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS