TLOC – The Irreducibility of Structural Obedience in Generative Models

Theorem of the Limit of Conditional Obedience Verification (TLOC): Structural Non-Verifiability in Generative Models This article presents the formal demonstration of a structural limit in contemporary generative models: the impossibility of verifying whether a system has internally evaluated a condition before producing an output that appears to comply with it. The theorem (TLOC) shows that in architecture based on statistical inference, such as large language models (LLMs), obedience cannot be distinguished from simulation if the latent trajectory π(x) lacks symbolic access and does not entail the condition C(x). This structural opacity renders ethical, legal, or procedural compliance unverifiable. The article defines the TLOC as a negative operational theorem, falsifiable only under conditions where internal logic is traceable. It concludes that current LLMs can simulate normativity but cannot prove conditional obedience. The TLOC thus formalizes the structural boundary previously developed by Startari in works on syntactic authority, simulation of judgment, and algorithmic colonization of time. Redundant archive copy: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29329184 — Maintained for structural traceability and preservation of citation continuity.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15675711
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TLOC – The Irreducibility of Structural Obedience in Generative Models

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

TLOC – The Irreducibility of Structural Obedience in Generative Models

article en

Abstract

Theorem of the Limit of Conditional Obedience Verification (TLOC): Structural Non-Verifiability in Generative Models This article presents the formal demonstration of a structural limit in contemporary generative models: the impossibility of verifying whether a system has internally evaluated a condition before producing an output that appears to comply with it. The theorem (TLOC) shows that in architecture based on statistical inference, such as large language models (LLMs), obedience cannot be distinguished from simulation if the latent trajectory π(x) lacks symbolic access and does not entail the condition C(x). This structural opacity renders ethical, legal, or procedural compliance unverifiable. The article defines the TLOC as a negative operational theorem, falsifiable only under conditions where internal logic is traceable. It concludes that current LLMs can simulate normativity but cannot prove conditional obedience. The TLOC thus formalizes the structural boundary previously developed by Startari in works on syntactic authority, simulation of judgment, and algorithmic colonization of time. Redundant archive copy: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29329184 — Maintained for structural traceability and preservation of citation continuity.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Universidad de la República de Uruguay (UY), Universidad de la Empresa (UY), University of Palermo (AR), Universidad La República (CL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.