Estimation of intangible quality costs using neutrosophic AHP-TOPSIS

This study addresses the challenge of quantifying intangible quality costs (IQCs), which are inherently subjective and often overlooked in traditional quality cost management. We propose a novel hybrid framework that integrates the Neutrosophic Analytic Hierarchy Process (NAHP) with triangular neutrosophic numbers and Neutrosophic TOPSIS (NTOPSIS) with single-valued neutrosophic sets (SVNS) to evaluate and prioritize IQCs. The framework enables the aggregation of expert inputs, transforming qualitative risks—such as supplier mistrust and communication gaps—into quantifiable cost metrics. Applied to a steel mill’s, the methodology allowed to cuantificate the IQCs of the scrap reception activity. The study concludes that the framework’s structured yet adaptive nature provides organizations with a practical tool for prioritizing and mitigating intangible quality risks, overcoming the limitations of conventional methods. The results validate the importance of neutrosophy in the decision-making process under uncertainty in quality cost management.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15640268
Primary Topic
Quality and Supply Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimation of intangible quality costs using neutrosophic AHP-TOPSIS

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality and Supply Management
article

Estimation of intangible quality costs using neutrosophic AHP-TOPSIS

article en

Abstract

This study addresses the challenge of quantifying intangible quality costs (IQCs), which are inherently subjective and often overlooked in traditional quality cost management. We propose a novel hybrid framework that integrates the Neutrosophic Analytic Hierarchy Process (NAHP) with triangular neutrosophic numbers and Neutrosophic TOPSIS (NTOPSIS) with single-valued neutrosophic sets (SVNS) to evaluate and prioritize IQCs. The framework enables the aggregation of expert inputs, transforming qualitative risks—such as supplier mistrust and communication gaps—into quantifiable cost metrics. Applied to a steel mill’s, the methodology allowed to cuantificate the IQCs of the scrap reception activity. The study concludes that the framework’s structured yet adaptive nature provides organizations with a practical tool for prioritizing and mitigating intangible quality risks, overcoming the limitations of conventional methods. The results validate the importance of neutrosophy in the decision-making process under uncertainty in quality cost management.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Quality and Supply Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Estimation of intangible quality costs using neutrosophic AHP-TOPSIS · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS