Triplaris fulva Huber 1906

Triplaris fulva Huber (1906: 560) Type:— PERU. [Loreto] Paca, on the Río Ucayali plain, 19 December 1898, J. E. Huber 1565 (holotype: MG [MG 1565, digital image!]; isotype: F [F 272513 (photonegative)]). Notes:— Brandbyge (1986) excluded this species from his treatment due to insufficient material. Also, the specimen cited in the protologue is not informative, being represented by a young and sterile individual. Brandbyge (1986) claims he saw a physical specimen of Huber 1565 at F, but we can only find a possible photonegative. There is a single specimen of Huber 1565 at MG (MG 1565), which is the holotype because in the protologue Huber (1906: 506) clearly stated “Achei esta especie n’um unicum exemplar...”. The location given here follows the work of Standley (1936). The protologue includes the type locality as “...perto de Paca, na varzea do Ucayali ...”. It is Standley (1936) that specifies the Paca in Loreto. This seems like a reasonable specification as the Paca in Loreto is the only Paca we could find that is on the Rio Ucayali. Finally, we note that Standley (1936) expressed doubts that this plant is a Triplaris species. Brandbyge (1986) disagreed, noting the hollow stems. The type locality must be revisited and better material collected in order to properly characterize T. fulva.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16727330
Primary Topic
Plant Diversity and Evolution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Triplaris fulva Huber 1906

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Plant Diversity and Evolution
article

Triplaris fulva Huber 1906

article en

Abstract

Triplaris fulva Huber (1906: 560) Type:— PERU. [Loreto] Paca, on the Río Ucayali plain, 19 December 1898, J. E. Huber 1565 (holotype: MG [MG 1565, digital image!]; isotype: F [F 272513 (photonegative)]). Notes:— Brandbyge (1986) excluded this species from his treatment due to insufficient material. Also, the specimen cited in the protologue is not informative, being represented by a young and sterile individual. Brandbyge (1986) claims he saw a physical specimen of Huber 1565 at F, but we can only find a possible photonegative. There is a single specimen of Huber 1565 at MG (MG 1565), which is the holotype because in the protologue Huber (1906: 506) clearly stated “Achei esta especie n’um unicum exemplar...”. The location given here follows the work of Standley (1936). The protologue includes the type locality as “...perto de Paca, na varzea do Ucayali ...”. It is Standley (1936) that specifies the Paca in Loreto. This seems like a reasonable specification as the Paca in Loreto is the only Paca we could find that is on the Rio Ucayali. Finally, we note that Standley (1936) expressed doubts that this plant is a Triplaris species. Brandbyge (1986) disagreed, noting the hollow stems. The type locality must be revisited and better material collected in order to properly characterize T. fulva.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Howard University (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Plant Diversity and Evolution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.