Cephennodes molestus Jałoszyński, 2025, sp. nov.

Cephennodes (s. str.) molestus sp. nov. (Figs 142–144) Type material. Holotype: CHINA (YUNNAN Prov.): ♂, two labels: “CHINA: Yunnan, Wuding, Lion / Mountain Scenic Area, 2200 m, / 25º31’59’’N, 102º22’36’’E, stream / valley with deciduous forest, moist / litter sifted 17.VIII.2014, / leg. M. Schülke [CH14-11]” [white, printed]; “ CEPHENNODES (s. str.) / molestus m. / P. Jałoszyński, 2025 / HOLOTYPUS ” [red, printed] (MNB). Paratypes (5 exx.): 1 ♂, same data as for holotype; 3 ♂♂, 1 ♀, “CHINA: Yunnan, Mt. W Xundian, / 25º34’58’’N, 103º08’42’’E, 2300 m, / mixed forest with alder, pine, / shrubs, litter, twigs, roots sifted, / 16.VIII.2014, Schülke [CH14-09 b]” [white, printed]. Paratypes with yellow PARATYPUS labels (cPJ, MNB). Diagnosis. Body very small, BL around 1.1–1.2 mm; antennae gradually thickened; punctures on head and pronotum small but sharply marked and distinct, separated by spaces subequal to their diameters, punctures on elytra superficial; subhumeral lines as long as 0.35 × EL. Male: lacking secondary sexual characters; aedeagus (Figs 143–144) in ventral view with drop-shaped capsular region of median lobe, its distal portion projecting into broad subrectangular truncate process, apical projections much wider than long and curved towards apex of capsular region. Description. Body of male (Fig. 142) moderately strongly convex, oval, with shallow but distinct constriction between pronotum and elytra, moderately light brown with lighter tarsi, covered with light brown setae. BL 1.08– 1.18 mm. Head broadest across moderately large and moderately strongly convex, coarsely faceted eyes, HL 0.15 mm, HW 0.28 mm; frontovertexal region weakly convex at middle; supraantennal tubercles weakly elevated. Punctures on clypeus and frontovertexal region small but distinct, separated by spaces subequal to their diameters; setae sparse, short, suberect. Antennae moderately long and slender, gradually and moderately strongly thickened, AnL 0.50–0.58 mm, antennomere 1 about as long as broad, 2 strongly elongate, 3–6 each about as long as broad, 7 slightly elongate, 8–10 each weakly transverse, 11 about as long as 9 and 10 combined, about 1.7 × as long as broad. Pronotum semi-oval, strongly convex at middle and flattened near hind corners, equally broad between base and middle; PL 0.30–0.35 mm, PW 0.48–0.50 mm. Anterior margin in strictly dorsal view nearly straight; lateral margins strongly rounded in anterior half and straight posteriorly, finely microserrate, posterior corners nearly right-angled; posterior margin shallowly bisinuate; lateral marginal carinae simple (i.e., not doubled); lateral antebasal pits shallow but distinct, each distinctly closer to lateral than posterior pronotal margin. Punctures on pronotal disc small but distinct, separated by spaces subequal to their diameters; setae short and moderately dense, suberect. Elytra as wide as pronotum, together oval, broadest near anterior third; EL 0.60–0.68 mm, EW 0.50–0.56 mm, EI 1.12–1.25; subhumeral lines as long as 0.35 × EL, developed as sharp borders between elevated humerus and lower mesal region, weakly divergent posterad; basal elytral fovea on each elytron situated slightly closer to lateral margin of mesoscutellum than to subhumeral line; elytral apices separately rounded. Punctures on elytra superficial and inconspicuous; setae similar to those on pronotum. Hind wings functional. Metaventrite with sharply marked lateral impressions as long as about half its length. Legs long and slender, unmodified. Aedeagus (Figs 143–144) of simonis form, AeL 0.10 mm; capsular region of median lobe in ventral view drop-shaped, its distal portion projecting into broad subrectangular truncate process with weakly concave distal margin, apical projections much wider than long and curved towards apex of capsular region; parameres long and relatively thick, not reaching apex of aedeagus, each with one moderately long apical seta. Female. Externally indistinguishable from male; wings not studied. BL 1.13 mm; HL 0.15 mm, HW 0.28 mm, AnL 0.53 mm; PL 0.35 mm, PW 0.50 mm; EL 0.63 mm, EW 0.55 mm, EI 1.14. Distribution. S China: Yunnan. Etymology. The Latin adjective molestus means troublesome; this species is difficult to identify based on external characters. Remarks. Besides C. molestus, only one species of the C. simonis group has the apical region of the capsular portion of the median lobe truncate, forming a subrectangular apical process. This is the Bornean C. simonis. In C. molestus, the lateral pronotal carinae are simple, i.e., developed as slightly thickened margins mesally accentuated by a step-wise difference in elevated margin and a lower discal surface. In C. simonis, the lateral pronotal carinae are doubled, i.e., in addition to a similarly developed margin, there is a sublateral carina running parallel and close to the margin. The shape of the aedeagus is also clearly different in these species, especially the apical plate, which in C. simonis is strongly curved and pointed in both ventral and lateral views (illustrated in Jałoszyński (2007a): figs. 3–4).

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16606524
Primary Topic
Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cephennodes molestus Jałoszyński, 2025, sp. nov.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
article

Cephennodes molestus Jałoszyński, 2025, sp. nov.

article en

Abstract

Cephennodes (s. str.) molestus sp. nov. (Figs 142–144) Type material. Holotype: CHINA (YUNNAN Prov.): ♂, two labels: “CHINA: Yunnan, Wuding, Lion / Mountain Scenic Area, 2200 m, / 25º31’59’’N, 102º22’36’’E, stream / valley with deciduous forest, moist / litter sifted 17.VIII.2014, / leg. M. Schülke [CH14-11]” [white, printed]; “ CEPHENNODES (s. str.) / molestus m. / P. Jałoszyński, 2025 / HOLOTYPUS ” [red, printed] (MNB). Paratypes (5 exx.): 1 ♂, same data as for holotype; 3 ♂♂, 1 ♀, “CHINA: Yunnan, Mt. W Xundian, / 25º34’58’’N, 103º08’42’’E, 2300 m, / mixed forest with alder, pine, / shrubs, litter, twigs, roots sifted, / 16.VIII.2014, Schülke [CH14-09 b]” [white, printed]. Paratypes with yellow PARATYPUS labels (cPJ, MNB). Diagnosis. Body very small, BL around 1.1–1.2 mm; antennae gradually thickened; punctures on head and pronotum small but sharply marked and distinct, separated by spaces subequal to their diameters, punctures on elytra superficial; subhumeral lines as long as 0.35 × EL. Male: lacking secondary sexual characters; aedeagus (Figs 143–144) in ventral view with drop-shaped capsular region of median lobe, its distal portion projecting into broad subrectangular truncate process, apical projections much wider than long and curved towards apex of capsular region. Description. Body of male (Fig. 142) moderately strongly convex, oval, with shallow but distinct constriction between pronotum and elytra, moderately light brown with lighter tarsi, covered with light brown setae. BL 1.08– 1.18 mm. Head broadest across moderately large and moderately strongly convex, coarsely faceted eyes, HL 0.15 mm, HW 0.28 mm; frontovertexal region weakly convex at middle; supraantennal tubercles weakly elevated. Punctures on clypeus and frontovertexal region small but distinct, separated by spaces subequal to their diameters; setae sparse, short, suberect. Antennae moderately long and slender, gradually and moderately strongly thickened, AnL 0.50–0.58 mm, antennomere 1 about as long as broad, 2 strongly elongate, 3–6 each about as long as broad, 7 slightly elongate, 8–10 each weakly transverse, 11 about as long as 9 and 10 combined, about 1.7 × as long as broad. Pronotum semi-oval, strongly convex at middle and flattened near hind corners, equally broad between base and middle; PL 0.30–0.35 mm, PW 0.48–0.50 mm. Anterior margin in strictly dorsal view nearly straight; lateral margins strongly rounded in anterior half and straight posteriorly, finely microserrate, posterior corners nearly right-angled; posterior margin shallowly bisinuate; lateral marginal carinae simple (i.e., not doubled); lateral antebasal pits shallow but distinct, each distinctly closer to lateral than posterior pronotal margin. Punctures on pronotal disc small but distinct, separated by spaces subequal to their diameters; setae short and moderately dense, suberect. Elytra as wide as pronotum, together oval, broadest near anterior third; EL 0.60–0.68 mm, EW 0.50–0.56 mm, EI 1.12–1.25; subhumeral lines as long as 0.35 × EL, developed as sharp borders between elevated humerus and lower mesal region, weakly divergent posterad; basal elytral fovea on each elytron situated slightly closer to lateral margin of mesoscutellum than to subhumeral line; elytral apices separately rounded. Punctures on elytra superficial and inconspicuous; setae similar to those on pronotum. Hind wings functional. Metaventrite with sharply marked lateral impressions as long as about half its length. Legs long and slender, unmodified. Aedeagus (Figs 143–144) of simonis form, AeL 0.10 mm; capsular region of median lobe in ventral view drop-shaped, its distal portion projecting into broad subrectangular truncate process with weakly concave distal margin, apical projections much wider than long and curved towards apex of capsular region; parameres long and relatively thick, not reaching apex of aedeagus, each with one moderately long apical seta. Female. Externally indistinguishable from male; wings not studied. BL 1.13 mm; HL 0.15 mm, HW 0.28 mm, AnL 0.53 mm; PL 0.35 mm, PW 0.50 mm; EL 0.63 mm, EW 0.55 mm, EI 1.14. Distribution. S China: Yunnan. Etymology. The Latin adjective molestus means troublesome; this species is difficult to identify based on external characters. Remarks. Besides C. molestus, only one species of the C. simonis group has the apical region of the capsular portion of the median lobe truncate, forming a subrectangular apical process. This is the Bornean C. simonis. In C. molestus, the lateral pronotal carinae are simple, i.e., developed as slightly thickened margins mesally accentuated by a step-wise difference in elevated margin and a lower discal surface. In C. simonis, the lateral pronotal carinae are doubled, i.e., in addition to a similarly developed margin, there is a sublateral carina running parallel and close to the margin. The shape of the aedeagus is also clearly different in these species, especially the apical plate, which in C. simonis is strongly curved and pointed in both ventral and lateral views (illustrated in Jałoszyński (2007a): figs. 3–4).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.