Comparison of Deep Learning Models for Diabetes Prediction

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic condition affecting millions globally. Early and accurate prediction of diabetes is crucial for timely intervention and effective management. This study investigates the predictive capabilities of five deep learning models—Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), and Deep Belief Network (DBN)—using a publicly available dataset. The models were trained and evaluated using different train-test splits and assessed based on accuracy, precision, and recall. Among the models, RNN achieved the highest accuracy and precision, while DBN recorded the highest recall, indicating strong performance in detecting true positives. CNN demonstrated consistent and balanced performance across splits, making it a reliable baseline. This comparative analysis highlights the trade-offs between different deep learning architectures and identifies the most effective approaches for diabetes prediction based on specific evaluation criteria.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-06-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15718928
Primary Topic
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Deep Learning Models for Diabetes Prediction

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
article

Comparison of Deep Learning Models for Diabetes Prediction

article en

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic condition affecting millions globally. Early and accurate prediction of diabetes is crucial for timely intervention and effective management. This study investigates the predictive capabilities of five deep learning models—Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), and Deep Belief Network (DBN)—using a publicly available dataset. The models were trained and evaluated using different train-test splits and assessed based on accuracy, precision, and recall. Among the models, RNN achieved the highest accuracy and precision, while DBN recorded the highest recall, indicating strong performance in detecting true positives. CNN demonstrated consistent and balanced performance across splits, making it a reliable baseline. This comparative analysis highlights the trade-offs between different deep learning architectures and identifies the most effective approaches for diabetes prediction based on specific evaluation criteria.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
MIT Art, Design and Technology University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Deep Learning Models for Diabetes Prediction · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS