Salvationism and Developmentalism: coloniality biases in an English language textbook

ABSTRACT This text analyses a unit from the English language textbook Life, which is used in language schools in Brazil and around the world. Through decolonial literature, our aim was to identify and analyse the biases of coloniality present in this unit. Using Content Analysis, we were able to verify the existence of two biases: salvationism and developmentalism. The first is related to the idea that communities considered primitive need to be saved and that colonised peoples are incapable of managing their own destiny. The second refers to the cultural imposition and the view that countries considered underdeveloped have the mission of achieving European evolution. Thus, we can see that the textbook analysed does not scape the ‘patriarchal/capitalist/colonial/modern world-system’ and that its knowledge is situated, despite the idea that there is neutrality in its content and vision. In this way, the textbook also supports the colonial discourse that has led to the suppression and marginalisation of traditional knowledge and practices. KEYWORDS: Decoloniality; Textbook; English language.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15605566
Primary Topic
Latin American Cultural Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Salvationism and Developmentalism: coloniality biases in an English language textbook

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Latin American Cultural Politics
article

Salvationism and Developmentalism: coloniality biases in an English language textbook

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This text analyses a unit from the English language textbook Life, which is used in language schools in Brazil and around the world. Through decolonial literature, our aim was to identify and analyse the biases of coloniality present in this unit. Using Content Analysis, we were able to verify the existence of two biases: salvationism and developmentalism. The first is related to the idea that communities considered primitive need to be saved and that colonised peoples are incapable of managing their own destiny. The second refers to the cultural imposition and the view that countries considered underdeveloped have the mission of achieving European evolution. Thus, we can see that the textbook analysed does not scape the ‘patriarchal/capitalist/colonial/modern world-system’ and that its knowledge is situated, despite the idea that there is neutrality in its content and vision. In this way, the textbook also supports the colonial discourse that has led to the suppression and marginalisation of traditional knowledge and practices. KEYWORDS: Decoloniality; Textbook; English language.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Latin American Cultural Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.