The Role and Significance of Communication Proficiencies in Augmenting Laboratory Technologist Efficacy and Patient Safety
Behind every accurate diagnosis is a team of dedicated Medical Laboratory Technologists (MLTs) ensuring precision and reliability in test results. But beyond running samples and operating equipment, one vital skill often gets overlooked—communication. A lapse in communication can mean delayed reports, wrong interpretations, or even risks to patient safety. This study set out to explore how MLTs, interns, and students perceive and practice communication in their daily work. We aimed to find out: How do lab professionals assess their communication skills? Are errors often linked to communication breakdowns? Should communication training be an essential part of MLT education? The results pointed to a clear message: many professionals feel their communication is “moderate”—they know it’s important but recognize room for improvement. Nearly half have witnessed errors directly tied to poor communication, and a strong majority believe communication training should be formally included in their curriculum. Why Communication Can’t Be Ignored in Labs Laboratories may seem like data-driven environments, but human connection plays a critical role. Every day, MLTs: Convert complex lab findings into clear, usable information for clinicians. Coordinate with healthcare teams, especially during emergencies or when reporting critical values. Interact with patients during sample collection, where empathy and clarity reduce anxiety. Ensure accurate documentation—because even a small error in communication can have major consequences. Despite this, structured communication training is still lacking in many MLT programs—even though miscommunication is a leading cause of lab-related errors.
Publication Details
- Journal
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Published
- 2025-06-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15597832
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.16