How Image Segmentation Affects Classification: Implications in a Cancer Diagnostic Model

This study investigates how segmentation impacts the performance of Vision Transformer (ViT) models in classifying histopathological images. We trained ViT on segmented images using the DigestPath dataset with expert-annotated masks and the BACH dataset with generated masks and then tested the model on unsegmented images. We compared the accuracy of this pipeline with another pipeline where the training was conducted on unsegmented images. Our results showed that segmentation affected classification differently depending on the dataset. In DigestPath, training on segmented images led to lower accuracy (62.12%) compared to unsegmented training (83.33%), likely due to overfitting on highly accurate ground-truth masks. Conversely, in BACH, training on segmented images improved accuracy (81.25% vs. 76.25%), suggesting that less accurate masks could enhance generalizability. These findings highlight the nuanced impact of image segmentation on the performance of classification models, particularly in histopathological image analysis.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15315672
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Image Segmentation Affects Classification: Implications in a Cancer Diagnostic Model

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
AI in cancer detection
article

How Image Segmentation Affects Classification: Implications in a Cancer Diagnostic Model

article en

Abstract

This study investigates how segmentation impacts the performance of Vision Transformer (ViT) models in classifying histopathological images. We trained ViT on segmented images using the DigestPath dataset with expert-annotated masks and the BACH dataset with generated masks and then tested the model on unsegmented images. We compared the accuracy of this pipeline with another pipeline where the training was conducted on unsegmented images. Our results showed that segmentation affected classification differently depending on the dataset. In DigestPath, training on segmented images led to lower accuracy (62.12%) compared to unsegmented training (83.33%), likely due to overfitting on highly accurate ground-truth masks. Conversely, in BACH, training on segmented images improved accuracy (81.25% vs. 76.25%), suggesting that less accurate masks could enhance generalizability. These findings highlight the nuanced impact of image segmentation on the performance of classification models, particularly in histopathological image analysis.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of Debrecen (HU), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How Image Segmentation Affects Classification: Implications in a Cancer Diagnostic Model · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS