AI-enabled disciplinary construction and assessment: dilemmas and pathways

AI has shown significant potential in enhancing the construction and high-quality assessment of academic disciplines. As China transitions from an index-driven to a high-quality development model in disciplinary construction, the focus has shifted from using evaluation indicators to solidify disciplinary foundations, to addressing societal concerns and improving overall standards through assessment, and ultimately toward stimulating the internal motivation for excellence. However, during this critical transformation period, AI-enabled disciplinary construction and evaluation still confront three major challenges, namely ideological inertia, technological limitations, and a lack of ecosystem support. Meanwhile, the historic push toward building a strong nation has accelerated the need for innovation in talent cultivation models, research paradigms, and evaluation mechanisms. In response, this study proposes a strategic path forward through deepening conceptual understanding and breaking cognitive barriers to integrate AI more effectively into decision-making process, building collaborative, open, and value-driven evaluation platforms to foster multi-stakeholder engagement, and advancing human-AI collaboration to drive adaptive transformation in assessment organizations through technological innovation, thereby creating a governance ecosystem characterized by human-machine complementarity and flexible responsiveness.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16875923
Primary Topic
Advanced Technologies in Various Fields
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-enabled disciplinary construction and assessment: dilemmas and pathways

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Technologies in Various Fields
article

AI-enabled disciplinary construction and assessment: dilemmas and pathways

article en

Abstract

AI has shown significant potential in enhancing the construction and high-quality assessment of academic disciplines. As China transitions from an index-driven to a high-quality development model in disciplinary construction, the focus has shifted from using evaluation indicators to solidify disciplinary foundations, to addressing societal concerns and improving overall standards through assessment, and ultimately toward stimulating the internal motivation for excellence. However, during this critical transformation period, AI-enabled disciplinary construction and evaluation still confront three major challenges, namely ideological inertia, technological limitations, and a lack of ecosystem support. Meanwhile, the historic push toward building a strong nation has accelerated the need for innovation in talent cultivation models, research paradigms, and evaluation mechanisms. In response, this study proposes a strategic path forward through deepening conceptual understanding and breaking cognitive barriers to integrate AI more effectively into decision-making process, building collaborative, open, and value-driven evaluation platforms to foster multi-stakeholder engagement, and advancing human-AI collaboration to drive adaptive transformation in assessment organizations through technological innovation, thereby creating a governance ecosystem characterized by human-machine complementarity and flexible responsiveness.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Beijing Institute of Technology (CN), Beijing Institute of Education (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Advanced Technologies in Various Fields
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.