Remote Viewing — Reproducible Protocol

A preregistered, multisite protocol to test free-response remote viewing with strict leakage control. Viewers generate narratives and sketches; scoring is double-blind via a fixed automated text→image similarity model (e.g., CLIP) and independent human judges (5-AFC; chance = 20%). Randomization and target locks are hash-committed in advance. Optional stratification includes Local Sidereal Time windows and logging of geomagnetic Kp as a covariate. The primary KPI is rank-1 hit-rate versus 20% (binomial/permutation + Bayes factors); secondary endpoints use continuous similarity scores and inter-rater reliability. Power targets a small uplift (e.g., 26% vs 20%), requiring ~400–600 independent trials, with design-effect corrections for clustering. No optional stopping. Go/No-Go requires p<0.01 (FDR-corrected) and BF10>10. All data, code, and preregistration artifacts are released openly.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16845911
Primary Topic
Cloud Computing and Remote Desktop Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Remote Viewing — Reproducible Protocol

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cloud Computing and Remote Desktop Technologies
article

Remote Viewing — Reproducible Protocol

article en

Abstract

A preregistered, multisite protocol to test free-response remote viewing with strict leakage control. Viewers generate narratives and sketches; scoring is double-blind via a fixed automated text→image similarity model (e.g., CLIP) and independent human judges (5-AFC; chance = 20%). Randomization and target locks are hash-committed in advance. Optional stratification includes Local Sidereal Time windows and logging of geomagnetic Kp as a covariate. The primary KPI is rank-1 hit-rate versus 20% (binomial/permutation + Bayes factors); secondary endpoints use continuous similarity scores and inter-rater reliability. Power targets a small uplift (e.g., 26% vs 20%), requiring ~400–600 independent trials, with design-effect corrections for clustering. No optional stopping. Go/No-Go requires p<0.01 (FDR-corrected) and BF10>10. All data, code, and preregistration artifacts are released openly.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Landscape Institute (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cloud Computing and Remote Desktop Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.