Primum in orbe deos fecit tempus? Una nota sulla storiografia e i regimi di storicità nella filosofia dei Lumi

In this paper, I discuss how philosophical historiography has addressed the issue of Enlightenment temporal conception, starting from Ernst Cassirer’s Die Philosophie der Aufklärung. Steering clear of both the classical and simplistic view of eighteenth-century historical optimism, which glorifies the progressive capacities of reason, and its opposite but symmetrical counterpart, the pessimism of the Enlightenment, I consider the ways in which two recent historiographical contributions by Bertrand Binoche and Giovanni Paoletti allow to rearticulate the problem in its entirety against the backdrop of Koselleck’s studies. Starting from the categories of historicity – that is, the ways in which the relationships between past, present, and future are reconnected – and of the passions of time – the collective and individual experience in the face of time as a whole – I reconstruct the trajectories and methodological problems open in current reflection on eighteenth-century philosophical histories.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14035279
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Historical Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Primum in orbe deos fecit tempus? Una nota sulla storiografia e i regimi di storicità nella filosofia dei Lumi

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Philosophy and Historical Thought
article

Primum in orbe deos fecit tempus? Una nota sulla storiografia e i regimi di storicità nella filosofia dei Lumi

article en

Abstract

In this paper, I discuss how philosophical historiography has addressed the issue of Enlightenment temporal conception, starting from Ernst Cassirer’s Die Philosophie der Aufklärung. Steering clear of both the classical and simplistic view of eighteenth-century historical optimism, which glorifies the progressive capacities of reason, and its opposite but symmetrical counterpart, the pessimism of the Enlightenment, I consider the ways in which two recent historiographical contributions by Bertrand Binoche and Giovanni Paoletti allow to rearticulate the problem in its entirety against the backdrop of Koselleck’s studies. Starting from the categories of historicity – that is, the ways in which the relationships between past, present, and future are reconnected – and of the passions of time – the collective and individual experience in the face of time as a whole – I reconstruct the trajectories and methodological problems open in current reflection on eighteenth-century philosophical histories.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Philosophy and Historical Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.