Beyond Article Processing Charges: Exploring Institutional Barriers in Open Access Publishing

The current scholarly communication landscape has witnessed an increasing uptake of open access (OA) as funding agencies have vehemently shown their support for an immediate availability of funded research, either through OA journals or institutional repositories. However, OA uptake in some disciplines has remained low, particularly in the humanities and social sciences (HSS). Some existing studies have attributed this to disciplinary norms, limited funding to pay for article processing charges (APCs), and researchers’ preferences. As such, little is known about other factors that may be responsible for the low uptake of OA in the HSS disciplines beyond the commonly reported factor – APCs. There is currently a growing concern about inequities in the scholarly communication landscape as OA publishing has remained inaccessible and unaffordable to many researchers, particularly among researchers from the Global South. This poster is a summary of a larger study that sheds light on factors limiting OA publishing among HSS researchers in research-intensive universities in Canada, focusing on inequities, gender disparity, unequal privileges, and unsupportive institutional policies.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15113834
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Article Processing Charges: Exploring Institutional Barriers in Open Access Publishing

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

Beyond Article Processing Charges: Exploring Institutional Barriers in Open Access Publishing

article en

Abstract

The current scholarly communication landscape has witnessed an increasing uptake of open access (OA) as funding agencies have vehemently shown their support for an immediate availability of funded research, either through OA journals or institutional repositories. However, OA uptake in some disciplines has remained low, particularly in the humanities and social sciences (HSS). Some existing studies have attributed this to disciplinary norms, limited funding to pay for article processing charges (APCs), and researchers’ preferences. As such, little is known about other factors that may be responsible for the low uptake of OA in the HSS disciplines beyond the commonly reported factor – APCs. There is currently a growing concern about inequities in the scholarly communication landscape as OA publishing has remained inaccessible and unaffordable to many researchers, particularly among researchers from the Global South. This poster is a summary of a larger study that sheds light on factors limiting OA publishing among HSS researchers in research-intensive universities in Canada, focusing on inequities, gender disparity, unequal privileges, and unsupportive institutional policies.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Lakehead University (CA)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.