Modelling the Dynamics of Public Investment and Growth: ARDL vs GMM in OECD Economies

Abstract: Public investment in infrastructure is critical for fostering economic growth; however, its effectiveness is debated. This study investigates the impact of transport infrastructure expenditure on economic growth across 33 OECD countries, employing a comparative analysis of ARDL and GMM models. The findings indicate a positive and statistically significant relationship, with the magnitude of contributions according to the time horizon and estimation approach utilized. The ARDL model demonstrates evidence of cointegration, while the GMM framework elucidates dynamic effects. A comparative analysis demonstrates that the two models are complementary, offering distinct yet consistent perspectives for evaluating the effectiveness of investment policies. This analysis underscores the necessity for targeted public policies and contributes to the literature by offering a methodological comparison within developed economies. Keywords: Economic Growth, GMM Estimation, Model Comparison, Panel Data, Panel ARDL, Transportation Public Investment JEL Classification Number: O4, C51, C52, C23, H54

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15764420
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modelling the Dynamics of Public Investment and Growth: ARDL vs GMM in OECD Economies

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
article

Modelling the Dynamics of Public Investment and Growth: ARDL vs GMM in OECD Economies

article en

Abstract

Abstract: Public investment in infrastructure is critical for fostering economic growth; however, its effectiveness is debated. This study investigates the impact of transport infrastructure expenditure on economic growth across 33 OECD countries, employing a comparative analysis of ARDL and GMM models. The findings indicate a positive and statistically significant relationship, with the magnitude of contributions according to the time horizon and estimation approach utilized. The ARDL model demonstrates evidence of cointegration, while the GMM framework elucidates dynamic effects. A comparative analysis demonstrates that the two models are complementary, offering distinct yet consistent perspectives for evaluating the effectiveness of investment policies. This analysis underscores the necessity for targeted public policies and contributes to the literature by offering a methodological comparison within developed economies. Keywords: Economic Growth, GMM Estimation, Model Comparison, Panel Data, Panel ARDL, Transportation Public Investment JEL Classification Number: O4, C51, C52, C23, H54

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Higher Institute of Management (RU), University of Sousse (TN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Modelling the Dynamics of Public Investment and Growth: ARDL vs GMM in OECD Economies · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS