SERVICE QUALITY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT WITH SEAL OF GOOD LOCAL GOVERNANCE

This study evaluates the service quality of a Local Government Unit (LGU) in Northern Negros Occidental awarded the Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG), using an Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Approach. Quantitative data were collected first from 1,528 respondents—barangay officials, senior citizens, SK officials, and women’s groups—followed by qualitative data to deepen the analysis. The SERVQUAL model was used to assess five service quality dimensions: tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy. Quantitative analysis using SPSS showed that overall service quality was perceived as “fair,” with mean scores of tangibles (2.97), reliability (2.75), responsiveness (2.80), assurance (2.90), and empathy (2.78). Respondents acknowledged improvements in infrastructure and digital tools but expressed concerns over bureaucratic delays, lack of assistive technologies, slow response times, and inconsistent staff professionalism. Qualitative data from focus group discussions and interviews supported these findings, highlighting frustration with long processes, poor communication, and lack of empathy. The study recommends simplifying bureaucratic procedures, improving communication strategies, investing in assistive and digital technologies, and offering training in emotional intelligence and customer service. These measures aim to enhance LGU responsiveness and promote inclusive, citizen-centered governance. Addressing both structural and interpersonal gaps in service delivery is essential for meeting stakeholder expectations and sustaining the principles of good local governance.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15545045
Primary Topic
Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SERVICE QUALITY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT WITH SEAL OF GOOD LOCAL GOVERNANCE

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
article

SERVICE QUALITY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT WITH SEAL OF GOOD LOCAL GOVERNANCE

article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the service quality of a Local Government Unit (LGU) in Northern Negros Occidental awarded the Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG), using an Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Approach. Quantitative data were collected first from 1,528 respondents—barangay officials, senior citizens, SK officials, and women’s groups—followed by qualitative data to deepen the analysis. The SERVQUAL model was used to assess five service quality dimensions: tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy. Quantitative analysis using SPSS showed that overall service quality was perceived as “fair,” with mean scores of tangibles (2.97), reliability (2.75), responsiveness (2.80), assurance (2.90), and empathy (2.78). Respondents acknowledged improvements in infrastructure and digital tools but expressed concerns over bureaucratic delays, lack of assistive technologies, slow response times, and inconsistent staff professionalism. Qualitative data from focus group discussions and interviews supported these findings, highlighting frustration with long processes, poor communication, and lack of empathy. The study recommends simplifying bureaucratic procedures, improving communication strategies, investing in assistive and digital technologies, and offering training in emotional intelligence and customer service. These measures aim to enhance LGU responsiveness and promote inclusive, citizen-centered governance. Addressing both structural and interpersonal gaps in service delivery is essential for meeting stakeholder expectations and sustaining the principles of good local governance.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.