REPRÉSENTATIONS SOCIALES ET RAPPORT À L'ÉCRIT : ANALYSE DES MÉMOIRES DE MASTER ET THÈSES DE DOCTORAT

In this article, we propose to analyze students' perceptions regarding the writing of dissertations, particularly master’s dissertations and doctoral theses, with reference to Abric's (1989) central core theory. The primary aim of this research is to understand students' relationship with academic writing and to identify the obstacles they encounter when completing their dissertations. More specifically, we aim to identify their perceptions of dissertation writing and examine how these perceptions influence their engagement with academic writing. To this end, we conducted a survey of individuals meeting specific criteria. The participants, selected based on their academic level and involvement in dissertation writing, include students and/or faculty members at Algerian universities. They have completed or are currently working on a master’s dissertation or doctoral thesis in the Humanities, with a focus on Didactics, Literature, and Linguistic Sciences. The data collected were analyzed using both quantitative and qualitative approaches to identify the challenges faced by participants. Findings from this study reveal a lack of academic training and significant writing challenges, which heighten the sense of insecurity associated with writing. Consequently, respondents' relationship with academic writing appears complex and characterized by difficulties. This research underscores the urgent need to improve academic training in writing methodology and to provide sustained guidance throughout students’ academic journeys, in order to facilitate the writing of final dissertations.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15743681
Primary Topic
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

REPRÉSENTATIONS SOCIALES ET RAPPORT À L'ÉCRIT : ANALYSE DES MÉMOIRES DE MASTER ET THÈSES DE DOCTORAT

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
article

REPRÉSENTATIONS SOCIALES ET RAPPORT À L'ÉCRIT : ANALYSE DES MÉMOIRES DE MASTER ET THÈSES DE DOCTORAT

article en

Abstract

In this article, we propose to analyze students' perceptions regarding the writing of dissertations, particularly master’s dissertations and doctoral theses, with reference to Abric's (1989) central core theory. The primary aim of this research is to understand students' relationship with academic writing and to identify the obstacles they encounter when completing their dissertations. More specifically, we aim to identify their perceptions of dissertation writing and examine how these perceptions influence their engagement with academic writing. To this end, we conducted a survey of individuals meeting specific criteria. The participants, selected based on their academic level and involvement in dissertation writing, include students and/or faculty members at Algerian universities. They have completed or are currently working on a master’s dissertation or doctoral thesis in the Humanities, with a focus on Didactics, Literature, and Linguistic Sciences. The data collected were analyzed using both quantitative and qualitative approaches to identify the challenges faced by participants. Findings from this study reveal a lack of academic training and significant writing challenges, which heighten the sense of insecurity associated with writing. Consequently, respondents' relationship with academic writing appears complex and characterized by difficulties. This research underscores the urgent need to improve academic training in writing methodology and to provide sustained guidance throughout students’ academic journeys, in order to facilitate the writing of final dissertations.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Blida (DZ)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.