Evaluation of Multiple Final Irrigantion Activation Methods on Smear Layer Removal -A SEM Study

ABSTRACT Introduction and Objective: This in vitro investigation aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of four irrigation activation techniques—EndoVac, EDDY tip, XP-Endo Finisher, and traditional syringe irrigation—in removing the smear layer from the palatal roots of extracted maxillary first molars. The evaluation was performed at coronal, middle, and apical thirds using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Materials and Methods: Sixty freshly extracted maxillary first molars with intact palatal roots were selected and randomly distributed into four groups (n=15) according to the final irrigation method. Root canals were prepared using EDGEENDO X3 rotary system and examined under SEM. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (p ≤ 0.05). Results and Conclusion: While none of the techniques eliminated the smear layer entirely, EndoVac, EDDY, and XP-Endo Finisher were significantly more effective than conventional needle irrigation at the apical third. No significant differences were observed at middle and coronal levels.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-08-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16753223
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Multiple Final Irrigantion Activation Methods on Smear Layer Removal -A SEM Study

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

Evaluation of Multiple Final Irrigantion Activation Methods on Smear Layer Removal -A SEM Study

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction and Objective: This in vitro investigation aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of four irrigation activation techniques—EndoVac, EDDY tip, XP-Endo Finisher, and traditional syringe irrigation—in removing the smear layer from the palatal roots of extracted maxillary first molars. The evaluation was performed at coronal, middle, and apical thirds using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Materials and Methods: Sixty freshly extracted maxillary first molars with intact palatal roots were selected and randomly distributed into four groups (n=15) according to the final irrigation method. Root canals were prepared using EDGEENDO X3 rotary system and examined under SEM. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (p ≤ 0.05). Results and Conclusion: While none of the techniques eliminated the smear layer entirely, EndoVac, EDDY, and XP-Endo Finisher were significantly more effective than conventional needle irrigation at the apical third. No significant differences were observed at middle and coronal levels.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Iraq University College (IQ)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.