Cognitive vs. Algorithmic Evolution: Bias, Adaptation, and Conflict in Human-AI Systems: An Economic Introspection

Abstract: This paper explores the evolutionary asymmetries between human and AI systems, highlighting the need for policymakers and practitioners to mitigate associated risks. To ensure transparent, explainable, and fair AI systems, policymakers should prioritize robust testing and validation protocols, bias detection and mitigation, and adaptable institutions that accommodate the changing nature of work. Furthermore, AI systems should be designed to promote digital inclusion, address marginalized communities' needs, and ensure equitable benefits. Future research avenues include exploring cultural implications, developing ethical AI metrics, and examining hybrid human-AI systems' resilience. Ultimately, addressing evolutionary asymmetries is crucial for fostering beneficial human-AI collaboration.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16374369
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cognitive vs. Algorithmic Evolution: Bias, Adaptation, and Conflict in Human-AI Systems: An Economic Introspection

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Cognitive vs. Algorithmic Evolution: Bias, Adaptation, and Conflict in Human-AI Systems: An Economic Introspection

article en

Abstract

Abstract: This paper explores the evolutionary asymmetries between human and AI systems, highlighting the need for policymakers and practitioners to mitigate associated risks. To ensure transparent, explainable, and fair AI systems, policymakers should prioritize robust testing and validation protocols, bias detection and mitigation, and adaptable institutions that accommodate the changing nature of work. Furthermore, AI systems should be designed to promote digital inclusion, address marginalized communities' needs, and ensure equitable benefits. Future research avenues include exploring cultural implications, developing ethical AI metrics, and examining hybrid human-AI systems' resilience. Ultimately, addressing evolutionary asymmetries is crucial for fostering beneficial human-AI collaboration.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Abuja (NG)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cognitive vs. Algorithmic Evolution: Bias, Adaptation, and Conflict in Human-AI Systems: An Economic Introspection · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS