Machine Learning Approaches for Estimating Roughness Coefficients in Two-Stage Sinuous Channels

Estimating the flow rate of streams during floods is rarely successful due to a lack of dependable data from the field in natural areas. Predicting discharge depends greatly on the value of Manning’s roughness coefficient. The study uses Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Gene Expression Programming (GEP), Extreme Learning Machines (ELM) and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) as AI techniques to determine Manning’s roughness coefficient in two-stage sinuous channels. Relative width, depth ratio, sinuosity ratio, channel bed slope and sinuous belt width ratio are the input variables used for the model. They were taken into account to determine the roughness adjustment factor. Several experiments were run to test how different parameters affect roughness prediction. Results of the developed AI models were compared to those of established analytical methods using various statistical tricks. During the testing phase, the highest accuracy was achieved by GPR and ANN (R² = 0.82). After that, GEP reached R² = 0.79 and ELM R² = 0.65. Predictions of Manning's n using the GPR method are quite accurate. However, the GEP model's ability to generate a generalized model equation for Manning's n makes it particularly valuable. Based on the above, the GEP model’s expression was applied to estimate Manning’s n for measurements of a flood from the Baitarani River in India. It was confirmed that the proposed models can work in experimentally small-scale environments and real rivers.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15479938
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning Approaches for Estimating Roughness Coefficients in Two-Stage Sinuous Channels

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
article

Machine Learning Approaches for Estimating Roughness Coefficients in Two-Stage Sinuous Channels

article en

Abstract

Estimating the flow rate of streams during floods is rarely successful due to a lack of dependable data from the field in natural areas. Predicting discharge depends greatly on the value of Manning’s roughness coefficient. The study uses Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Gene Expression Programming (GEP), Extreme Learning Machines (ELM) and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) as AI techniques to determine Manning’s roughness coefficient in two-stage sinuous channels. Relative width, depth ratio, sinuosity ratio, channel bed slope and sinuous belt width ratio are the input variables used for the model. They were taken into account to determine the roughness adjustment factor. Several experiments were run to test how different parameters affect roughness prediction. Results of the developed AI models were compared to those of established analytical methods using various statistical tricks. During the testing phase, the highest accuracy was achieved by GPR and ANN (R² = 0.82). After that, GEP reached R² = 0.79 and ELM R² = 0.65. Predictions of Manning's n using the GPR method are quite accurate. However, the GEP model's ability to generate a generalized model equation for Manning's n makes it particularly valuable. Based on the above, the GEP model’s expression was applied to estimate Manning’s n for measurements of a flood from the Baitarani River in India. It was confirmed that the proposed models can work in experimentally small-scale environments and real rivers.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Department of Health & Family Welfare (IN), Vellore Institute of Technology University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.