Recognising Non-Market Public Value: Participation, Legitimacy, and Rights-Based Fiscal Design

This discussion paper explores how societies can recognise and support non-monetised public value such as care work, ecological stewardship, and knowledge creation within a fiscal system grounded in the taxation of economic and exclusive rights and privileges. While rights-based taxation improves equity, efficiency, and resilience by targeting structural advantage, it does not inherently account for contributions that occur outside formal markets or wage-based systems. To address this gap, the paper proposes a recognition framework that affirms unpaid labour and civic participation as essential forms of public value. Mechanisms such as care credits, ecological service credits, and public participation registries are introduced as non-monetary instruments for acknowledging contributions that are vital to social and ecological wellbeing but often excluded from national accounts. These instruments do not require commodification and can operate alongside wage-based systems or be integrated into broader fiscal architectures, including but not limited to a mission-oriented Job Guarantee programme. This is version 1.0 of an independent discussion paper intended to inform policy, modelling, and civic design. Future updates may expand annexes or respond to peer feedback.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15366878
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recognising Non-Market Public Value: Participation, Legitimacy, and Rights-Based Fiscal Design

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

Recognising Non-Market Public Value: Participation, Legitimacy, and Rights-Based Fiscal Design

article en

Abstract

This discussion paper explores how societies can recognise and support non-monetised public value such as care work, ecological stewardship, and knowledge creation within a fiscal system grounded in the taxation of economic and exclusive rights and privileges. While rights-based taxation improves equity, efficiency, and resilience by targeting structural advantage, it does not inherently account for contributions that occur outside formal markets or wage-based systems. To address this gap, the paper proposes a recognition framework that affirms unpaid labour and civic participation as essential forms of public value. Mechanisms such as care credits, ecological service credits, and public participation registries are introduced as non-monetary instruments for acknowledging contributions that are vital to social and ecological wellbeing but often excluded from national accounts. These instruments do not require commodification and can operate alongside wage-based systems or be integrated into broader fiscal architectures, including but not limited to a mission-oriented Job Guarantee programme. This is version 1.0 of an independent discussion paper intended to inform policy, modelling, and civic design. Future updates may expand annexes or respond to peer feedback.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Recognising Non-Market Public Value: Participation, Legitimacy, and Rights-Based Fiscal Design · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS