FROM DAKSHIN KOSALA TO CHHATTISGARH: A HISTORICAL TRANSITION OF IDENTITY AND GOVERNANCE

This research paper explores the historical evolution of Chhattisgarh from its ancient identity as DakshinKosala to its present status as a modern Indian state, formed in the year 2000. The study critically examines the multifaceted transition that spans centuries, tracing the political, cultural, economic, and administrative developments that collectively shaped the region’s distinct identity and ultimately led to its demand for statehood. The first part of the paper delves into the ancient political heritage of DakshinKosala, highlighting the contributions of native dynasties such as the Panduvamshis and Kalachuris in establishing regional governance and cultural autonomy. The second section investigates how cultural identity, particularly tribal traditions, local languages, and folk practices, served as the bedrock of continuity amid changing regimes and external influences. The paper then moves into the colonial period, analyzing the impact of British administrative reforms, revenue extraction, and forest laws that disrupted traditional governance and dispossessed tribal communities. Post-independence, the inclusion of Chhattisgarh within Madhya Pradesh failed to address longstanding regional disparities, despite the region’s natural wealth in minerals, forests, and agriculture. This led to increasing economic marginalization and social underdevelopment, which catalyzed grassroots mobilization and demands for autonomy. The final section evaluates the political movements and democratic negotiations that resulted in the creation of Chhattisgarh as a separate state. By synthesizing historical records, socio-political commentary, and critical scholarly perspectives, this study asserts that the formation of Chhattisgarh was not merely a political act but a reclamation of historical and cultural identity, long overshadowed by centralized governance. This research contributes to a broader understanding of regionalism in India and underscores the significance of cultural memory, local governance, and historical continuity in the shaping of modern states.