Camponotus annulatus Karawajew 1929

Camponotus (Myrmamblys) annulatus Karawajew, 1929c: 238, Fig. 4, s, w. Current status: Camponotus annulatus. Type locality(-ies): “Ins. Wammar, Aru-Archip., 10.III.1918 (Nr. 2578), einige Soldaten und ww”. Original Karawajew labels: 3 w, “Wammar, / Aru. Kara- / vaiev”, “240. Coll. / Karavaievi ”, “ Camponotus / (Myrmamblys) / annulatus Kar. / typus”, “Syntypus Camponotus / (Myrmamblys) an- / nulatus Karawajew”. 7 w, “240. Coll. / Karavaievi”, “ Syntypus Camponotus / (Myrmamblys) an- / nulatus Karawajew”. Material: “ SYNTYPES ”, 10 w (CASENT0917165) (Box 34). Note. Karawajew (1929c) gave the number of syntypes in the C. annulatus series as “2578”, but in the collection the number of syntypes is 240. On the other hand, in the collection of the natural History Museum Basel (collection of F. Santschi) there are syntype workers of C. annulatus with original labels from Karawajew that read “2578. Coll. / Karavaievi”(see CASENT0911656 and0911657).We cannot explain this discrepancy,but based on Recommendation 72B of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN 1999), we conclude the specimens from SIZK No. 240 are part of the type series. In addition, in Karawajew’s collection there are 6 gynes with the labels “240. Coll. / Karavaievi”, “ Syntypus / Camponotus (Myrmamblys) an- / nulatus Karawajew” (see CASENT0917166) which formally cannot be syntypes, since this species was described based on workers and one soldier.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15232238
Primary Topic
Spider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Camponotus annulatus Karawajew 1929

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Spider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies
article

Camponotus annulatus Karawajew 1929

article en

Abstract

Camponotus (Myrmamblys) annulatus Karawajew, 1929c: 238, Fig. 4, s, w. Current status: Camponotus annulatus. Type locality(-ies): “Ins. Wammar, Aru-Archip., 10.III.1918 (Nr. 2578), einige Soldaten und ww”. Original Karawajew labels: 3 w, “Wammar, / Aru. Kara- / vaiev”, “240. Coll. / Karavaievi ”, “ Camponotus / (Myrmamblys) / annulatus Kar. / typus”, “Syntypus Camponotus / (Myrmamblys) an- / nulatus Karawajew”. 7 w, “240. Coll. / Karavaievi”, “ Syntypus Camponotus / (Myrmamblys) an- / nulatus Karawajew”. Material: “ SYNTYPES ”, 10 w (CASENT0917165) (Box 34). Note. Karawajew (1929c) gave the number of syntypes in the C. annulatus series as “2578”, but in the collection the number of syntypes is 240. On the other hand, in the collection of the natural History Museum Basel (collection of F. Santschi) there are syntype workers of C. annulatus with original labels from Karawajew that read “2578. Coll. / Karavaievi”(see CASENT0911656 and0911657).We cannot explain this discrepancy,but based on Recommendation 72B of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN 1999), we conclude the specimens from SIZK No. 240 are part of the type series. In addition, in Karawajew’s collection there are 6 gynes with the labels “240. Coll. / Karavaievi”, “ Syntypus / Camponotus (Myrmamblys) an- / nulatus Karawajew” (see CASENT0917166) which formally cannot be syntypes, since this species was described based on workers and one soldier.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
California Academy of Sciences (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Spider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.