Exploring the Trust and Adoption of AI-Driven Cybersecurity Solutions in the Real-World Context

AI in Cybersecurity has gained a lot of attention lately with promises of better threat detection, automated response and predictive analytics. But despite the promise, IT professionals lack trust and adoption of AI driven Cybersecurity solutions. This study looks at the real-world impact of AI in Cybersecurity, identifying the key factors that influence trust, barriers to adoption and effectiveness in dynamic security environments. Using data from LinkedIn polls involving over 4,500 Cybersecurity professionals, this research uncovers scepticism towards AI’s reliability, demand for real world evidence and concerns around data quality, algorithmic bias and ethical considerations. Results show that trust issues (50%) and lack of real-world evidence (27%) are the top barriers to AI adoption. Additionally, 78% of respondents said they wouldn’t rely solely on AI for Cybersecurity, they want human oversight. The findings suggest that more transparency, case studies showing real world AI performance and a hybrid human-AI approach are key to improving adoption. This research provides empirical insights into the ongoing debate on AI in Cybersecurity and recommendations to bridge the gap between AI’s theory and practice in securing digital spaces.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15091398
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Trust and Adoption of AI-Driven Cybersecurity Solutions in the Real-World Context

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Exploring the Trust and Adoption of AI-Driven Cybersecurity Solutions in the Real-World Context

article en

Abstract

AI in Cybersecurity has gained a lot of attention lately with promises of better threat detection, automated response and predictive analytics. But despite the promise, IT professionals lack trust and adoption of AI driven Cybersecurity solutions. This study looks at the real-world impact of AI in Cybersecurity, identifying the key factors that influence trust, barriers to adoption and effectiveness in dynamic security environments. Using data from LinkedIn polls involving over 4,500 Cybersecurity professionals, this research uncovers scepticism towards AI’s reliability, demand for real world evidence and concerns around data quality, algorithmic bias and ethical considerations. Results show that trust issues (50%) and lack of real-world evidence (27%) are the top barriers to AI adoption. Additionally, 78% of respondents said they wouldn’t rely solely on AI for Cybersecurity, they want human oversight. The findings suggest that more transparency, case studies showing real world AI performance and a hybrid human-AI approach are key to improving adoption. This research provides empirical insights into the ongoing debate on AI in Cybersecurity and recommendations to bridge the gap between AI’s theory and practice in securing digital spaces.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
IU International University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.