CEE2ACT Report on sustainability assessment of the bioeoconomy concepts

To maximize the bioeconomy’s potential, all sectors—including agriculture, forestry, aquaculture, and biotechnology—must be equally considered, along with their respective products such as food, feed, wood, and biobased goods. Evaluations of bioeconomy strategies must align with national frameworks and account for diverse stakeholder interests. A collaborative approach was adopted to assess relevant options and indicators, identifying challenges and potentials in each of the 10 target countries through a baseline assessment. Feasibility and sustainability of options were evaluated using nine indicators covering environmental, social, and economic dimensions. Environmental indicators utilized Life Cycle Assessments, while quantitative assessments analyzed renewable energy and biomass production. Social indicators like consumer acceptance and economic factors like willingness to pay were gauged through surveys. Key findings highlighted that locally tailored solutions yield varying results. On average, the most sustainable options included central and small-scale heating plants, food waste reduction, sustainable diets, and nature tourism. Options like insect farming and inland aquaculture had lower feasibility due to limited acceptance or biomass yield.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15024692
Primary Topic
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CEE2ACT Report on sustainability assessment of the bioeoconomy concepts

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
article

CEE2ACT Report on sustainability assessment of the bioeoconomy concepts

article en

Abstract

To maximize the bioeconomy’s potential, all sectors—including agriculture, forestry, aquaculture, and biotechnology—must be equally considered, along with their respective products such as food, feed, wood, and biobased goods. Evaluations of bioeconomy strategies must align with national frameworks and account for diverse stakeholder interests. A collaborative approach was adopted to assess relevant options and indicators, identifying challenges and potentials in each of the 10 target countries through a baseline assessment. Feasibility and sustainability of options were evaluated using nine indicators covering environmental, social, and economic dimensions. Environmental indicators utilized Life Cycle Assessments, while quantitative assessments analyzed renewable energy and biomass production. Social indicators like consumer acceptance and economic factors like willingness to pay were gauged through surveys. Key findings highlighted that locally tailored solutions yield varying results. On average, the most sustainable options included central and small-scale heating plants, food waste reduction, sustainable diets, and nature tourism. Options like insect farming and inland aquaculture had lower feasibility due to limited acceptance or biomass yield.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

CEE2ACT Report on sustainability assessment of the bioeoconomy concepts · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS