Blessings of Inherent Powers of Courts: A Comparative Study of National and International Practises

Abstract Almost all the Courts whether national or international exercising inherent powers to promote justice but their exercise notably varies across various jurisdictions thereby, leading to uncertainties in the justice administration. This study concentrates on the investigation of causes of such inconsistencies in exercise of inherent powers, with special focus on scope, jurisprudence and limitations of such powers in Courts across Pakistan, United States of America, India and International Court of Justice, in order to choose best practices and way forward for reforms. The methodology of doctrinal research, involving comparative analysis as basic tool for key findings and recommendations. This article asserts the need for uniformity in the application of inherent powers. Exploration of application of doctrine of inherent powers is crucial for understanding the scope of problem. This article identifies lacunas in the exercise of Inherent powers by various Civil and international Courts, to highlights way forward for uniform and unbiased application of these powers.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15433781
Primary Topic
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blessings of Inherent Powers of Courts: A Comparative Study of National and International Practises

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
article

Blessings of Inherent Powers of Courts: A Comparative Study of National and International Practises

article en

Abstract

Abstract Almost all the Courts whether national or international exercising inherent powers to promote justice but their exercise notably varies across various jurisdictions thereby, leading to uncertainties in the justice administration. This study concentrates on the investigation of causes of such inconsistencies in exercise of inherent powers, with special focus on scope, jurisprudence and limitations of such powers in Courts across Pakistan, United States of America, India and International Court of Justice, in order to choose best practices and way forward for reforms. The methodology of doctrinal research, involving comparative analysis as basic tool for key findings and recommendations. This article asserts the need for uniformity in the application of inherent powers. Exploration of application of doctrine of inherent powers is crucial for understanding the scope of problem. This article identifies lacunas in the exercise of Inherent powers by various Civil and international Courts, to highlights way forward for uniform and unbiased application of these powers.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Sargodha (PK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Blessings of Inherent Powers of Courts: A Comparative Study of National and International Practises · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS