PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS AND LEGAL MECHANISMS FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILD RIGHTS

In the 21st century, the issue of child rights has emerged as one of the most complex and multidimensional fields of research, bridging philosophical anthropology, practical ethics, political philosophy, international, civil (private), and constitutional law, criminology, and social policy. This paper aims to provide a critical and systematic analysis of the concept of child rights through two key dimensions: the exploration of its philosophical foundations and the empirical-normative evaluation of existing legal mechanisms. The philosophical inquiry is based on a synthetic approach that draws from both analytic and continental traditions of philosophy. Particular emphasis is placed on the ontological and epistemological justification of child rights. The analysis includes the classical authors (Locke, Rousseau, Kant) as well as contemporary theorists (Rawls, Nozick, Dworkin, Sen, Nussbaum, MacIntyre), enabling an in-depth examination of the dilemma between paternalism and autonomy. The legal dimension of the paper focuses on international (particularly the 1989 UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and its Optional Protocols), regional, and national legal frameworks. Special attention is paid to contemporary challenges, including the specificities of the digital age, multiculturalism, and the dilemma of universal rights. The article analyses landmark rulings of the European Court of Human Rights, general comments of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, and the implementation practices of the Third Optional Protocol. The study seeks to foster an integrated understanding of philosophical and legal approaches to child rights. The research is grounded in an interdisciplinary methodology, combining legal, ethical, and philosophical methods. It employs the dogmatic-legal approach, referencing general comments by the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child and relevant case law of the European Court of Human Rights. The authors identify systemic challenges and propose recommendations to enhance the effectiveness of child rights protection mechanisms.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16615328
Primary Topic
Children's Rights and Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS AND LEGAL MECHANISMS FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILD RIGHTS

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Children's Rights and Participation
article

PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS AND LEGAL MECHANISMS FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILD RIGHTS

article en

Abstract

In the 21st century, the issue of child rights has emerged as one of the most complex and multidimensional fields of research, bridging philosophical anthropology, practical ethics, political philosophy, international, civil (private), and constitutional law, criminology, and social policy. This paper aims to provide a critical and systematic analysis of the concept of child rights through two key dimensions: the exploration of its philosophical foundations and the empirical-normative evaluation of existing legal mechanisms. The philosophical inquiry is based on a synthetic approach that draws from both analytic and continental traditions of philosophy. Particular emphasis is placed on the ontological and epistemological justification of child rights. The analysis includes the classical authors (Locke, Rousseau, Kant) as well as contemporary theorists (Rawls, Nozick, Dworkin, Sen, Nussbaum, MacIntyre), enabling an in-depth examination of the dilemma between paternalism and autonomy. The legal dimension of the paper focuses on international (particularly the 1989 UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and its Optional Protocols), regional, and national legal frameworks. Special attention is paid to contemporary challenges, including the specificities of the digital age, multiculturalism, and the dilemma of universal rights. The article analyses landmark rulings of the European Court of Human Rights, general comments of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, and the implementation practices of the Third Optional Protocol. The study seeks to foster an integrated understanding of philosophical and legal approaches to child rights. The research is grounded in an interdisciplinary methodology, combining legal, ethical, and philosophical methods. It employs the dogmatic-legal approach, referencing general comments by the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child and relevant case law of the European Court of Human Rights. The authors identify systemic challenges and propose recommendations to enhance the effectiveness of child rights protection mechanisms.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Children's Rights and Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS AND LEGAL MECHANISMS FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILD RIGHTS · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS