Climate Justice and the Right to Development: A RtD Analysis of the ICJ Oral Hearings on Climate Change

In December 2024, the International Court of Justice convened a series of oral hearings in The Hague (International Court of Justice, 2024) to solicit an advisory opinion on States’ legal obligations regarding climate change. In this historic context, the Group of Advocates for the Right to Development (GARtD) are analyzing the proceedings from a Right to Development (RtD) perspective. This analysis not only interrogates how the ICJ is framing its assessment of State responsibilities but also reflects on several interrelated themes—such as ensuring fair and inclusive negotiation outcomes, identifying limitations in existing climate finance mechanisms (including the Loss and Damage framework), operationalizing self-determination and sovereignty over natural resources,promoting equality development opportunities and equitable resource distribution ,and enhancing accountability mechanisms for climate commitments. With the ICJ’s non-binding advisory opinion expected later this year—and given renewed momentum toward the potential adoption of a legally binding international covenant on the Right to Development by the UN General Assembly—this analysis is both timely and relevant.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15091646
Primary Topic
Environmental law and policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate Justice and the Right to Development: A RtD Analysis of the ICJ Oral Hearings on Climate Change

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Environmental law and policy
article

Climate Justice and the Right to Development: A RtD Analysis of the ICJ Oral Hearings on Climate Change

article en

Abstract

In December 2024, the International Court of Justice convened a series of oral hearings in The Hague (International Court of Justice, 2024) to solicit an advisory opinion on States’ legal obligations regarding climate change. In this historic context, the Group of Advocates for the Right to Development (GARtD) are analyzing the proceedings from a Right to Development (RtD) perspective. This analysis not only interrogates how the ICJ is framing its assessment of State responsibilities but also reflects on several interrelated themes—such as ensuring fair and inclusive negotiation outcomes, identifying limitations in existing climate finance mechanisms (including the Loss and Damage framework), operationalizing self-determination and sovereignty over natural resources,promoting equality development opportunities and equitable resource distribution ,and enhancing accountability mechanisms for climate commitments. With the ICJ’s non-binding advisory opinion expected later this year—and given renewed momentum toward the potential adoption of a legally binding international covenant on the Right to Development by the UN General Assembly—this analysis is both timely and relevant.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Environmental law and policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Climate Justice and the Right to Development: A RtD Analysis of the ICJ Oral Hearings on Climate Change · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS