A legal perspective on language, oppression and naming practices in South Africa

The progressive nature of the South African constitution in solidifying and safeguarding women’s rights, including the right to dignity and equality, is highly regarded. The formulation of these realities has been undermined by the legacy of apartheid and colonialism, which have complicated the evolution of legislation and language in South Africa. Language and the legal system are inextricably linked, and discriminatory practices against women are still prevalent today. The objective of the article is to demonstrate the overt and covert oppression of African women by language and law. It will examine the stereotypical roles that women frequently assume in society (wife, mother, and daughter) in relation to the laws that govern naming practices. Our discussion will consider the Birth and Death Registrations Act 51 of 1992, the Children’s Act 38 of 2005, and the Civil Union Act 17 of 2006 in terms of their naming practices and their consequences for women. We contend that the law favours men and instils prejudice against women, resulting in inequality between men and women and the denial of women’s access to justice due to discrimination against female subjects in naming conventions.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14207523
Primary Topic
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A legal perspective on language, oppression and naming practices in South Africa

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
article

A legal perspective on language, oppression and naming practices in South Africa

article en

Abstract

The progressive nature of the South African constitution in solidifying and safeguarding women’s rights, including the right to dignity and equality, is highly regarded. The formulation of these realities has been undermined by the legacy of apartheid and colonialism, which have complicated the evolution of legislation and language in South Africa. Language and the legal system are inextricably linked, and discriminatory practices against women are still prevalent today. The objective of the article is to demonstrate the overt and covert oppression of African women by language and law. It will examine the stereotypical roles that women frequently assume in society (wife, mother, and daughter) in relation to the laws that govern naming practices. Our discussion will consider the Birth and Death Registrations Act 51 of 1992, the Children’s Act 38 of 2005, and the Civil Union Act 17 of 2006 in terms of their naming practices and their consequences for women. We contend that the law favours men and instils prejudice against women, resulting in inequality between men and women and the denial of women’s access to justice due to discrimination against female subjects in naming conventions.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Mangosuthu University of Technology (ZA), Varna Free University (BG)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.