Comparative Study of Intraperitoneal Infiltration of 0.5% Ropivacaine with and without Morphine in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for PostOperative Analgesia

Introduction: Patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy complain more of visceral pain which results from the stretching of intra-abdominal cavity, peritoneal inflammation and phrenic nerve irritation caused by residual carbon dioxide in the peritoneal cavity. Intraperitoneal (IP) local anaesthetics and opioids are gaining popularity for better pain relief in laparoscopic surgeries. The rationale to use the intraperitoneal route is that the peritoneum is exposed to blocking of visceral nociceptive conduction, thereby providing an additional mechanism of analgesia. Methods: All eligible patients were randomly allocated into two groups as Group R (0.5% Ropivacaine group) and Group M (0.5% Ropivacaine plus Morphine group) by using calendar odd and even date method. At the end of surgery, after removal of gallbladder, study drug was instilled onto the gallbladder bed intraperitoneally via port under vision. Group R patients received 20ml of plain 0.5% ropivacaine while Group M received patient’s received18ml of plain 0.5%ropivacaine plus 2ml (3mg) morphine. The main aim of our study was to assess the postoperative duration of analgesia in both the groups with NRS (Numerical Rating Scoring) and hemodynamic changes as respiratory rate, heart rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) after IP instillation of the study drug. Results: In both groups, demographic profile were comparable and statistically insignificant. NRS scores was significant after a time interval of two hours postoperatively between the two groups , the difference remained up to 5 hours (p-value <0.05). In Group M, pain(NRS) score was significantly lower than the patients of ropivacaine 0.5% (Group R). The time of first rescue analgesia was statistically significantly longer in Group M(278±53.39 minutes)than Group R (216±49.03minutes)- (p value <0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in haemodynamic parameters and mean respiratory Rate (p value >0.05)in the two groups. Conclusion: The findings of the study demonstrate that patients receiving the combination of morphine and ropivacaine experienced a notably lower pain scores and extended time to the first rescue analgesia. This suggests a synergistic interaction between morphine, an opioid analgesic and ropivacaine, a local anaesthetic, resulting in enhanced and prolonged postoperative analgesia.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14038106
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of Intraperitoneal Infiltration of 0.5% Ropivacaine with and without Morphine in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for PostOperative Analgesia

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Comparative Study of Intraperitoneal Infiltration of 0.5% Ropivacaine with and without Morphine in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for PostOperative Analgesia

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy complain more of visceral pain which results from the stretching of intra-abdominal cavity, peritoneal inflammation and phrenic nerve irritation caused by residual carbon dioxide in the peritoneal cavity. Intraperitoneal (IP) local anaesthetics and opioids are gaining popularity for better pain relief in laparoscopic surgeries. The rationale to use the intraperitoneal route is that the peritoneum is exposed to blocking of visceral nociceptive conduction, thereby providing an additional mechanism of analgesia. Methods: All eligible patients were randomly allocated into two groups as Group R (0.5% Ropivacaine group) and Group M (0.5% Ropivacaine plus Morphine group) by using calendar odd and even date method. At the end of surgery, after removal of gallbladder, study drug was instilled onto the gallbladder bed intraperitoneally via port under vision. Group R patients received 20ml of plain 0.5% ropivacaine while Group M received patient’s received18ml of plain 0.5%ropivacaine plus 2ml (3mg) morphine. The main aim of our study was to assess the postoperative duration of analgesia in both the groups with NRS (Numerical Rating Scoring) and hemodynamic changes as respiratory rate, heart rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) after IP instillation of the study drug. Results: In both groups, demographic profile were comparable and statistically insignificant. NRS scores was significant after a time interval of two hours postoperatively between the two groups , the difference remained up to 5 hours (p-value <0.05). In Group M, pain(NRS) score was significantly lower than the patients of ropivacaine 0.5% (Group R). The time of first rescue analgesia was statistically significantly longer in Group M(278±53.39 minutes)than Group R (216±49.03minutes)- (p value <0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in haemodynamic parameters and mean respiratory Rate (p value >0.05)in the two groups. Conclusion: The findings of the study demonstrate that patients receiving the combination of morphine and ropivacaine experienced a notably lower pain scores and extended time to the first rescue analgesia. This suggests a synergistic interaction between morphine, an opioid analgesic and ropivacaine, a local anaesthetic, resulting in enhanced and prolonged postoperative analgesia.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Bhopal Memorial Hospital & Research Centre (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.