Keynes's A Treatise on Probability is based on Boole's formal, mathematical, symbolic logic: Keynes was a formalist and logicist

Abstract J M Keynes’s work in his A Treatise on Probability (1921) is based on the formal application of Boole’s relational, propositional logic and interval valued probability as presented in his The Laws of Thought (1854). Keynes then based his A Treatise on Money and General Theory on his work in Part II of the A Treatise on Probability as presented in Chapters X through XVII. This work is the basis for Keynes’s comments on mathematical and statistical methods and application in chapters 6,7 and 8 of Volume I of his 1930 A Treatise on Money and chapters 4 ,12 and 17 of the General Theory on using approximation, inexact measurement and reasonable calculation as opposed to precise ,exact, unreasonable mathematical expectations. Keynes’s clear statements in his Treatise on Probability about the nature of his technical work can only lead to the following conclusion -Keynes was a formalist and a logicist .All existing orthodox and heterodox “interpretations” of Keynes’s works are attempts by economists to reinterpret Keynes’s work ,so as to try to fit him into some version of either Benthamite utilitarianism (precise probability and precise utility a la James Tobin,1958) or a nihilist position(Joan Robinson ,G L S Shackle ,T. Lawson ,Post Keynesians ,Institutionalists). Keynes’s position is so clearly defined and presented by him in his A Treatise on Probability that the only conclusion possible is that both orthodox and heterodox economists have never read Keynes’s A Treatise on Probability ,except possibly for small , scattered bits and pieces cobbled together in a confused and confusing manner .The justification for this decision not to read the A treatise on Probability is based on the false claim that F P Ramsey had shown that Keynes’s formal, Boolean, relational , propositional logic was erroneous .Accepting Ramsey’s false claims thus made it impossible for economists to see that the underlying foundations of the A Treatise on Money and General Theory are built on the formal ,mathematical analysis presented in Part II of Keynes’s A treatise on Probability. Keynes later extended his propositional logic to include an introductory use of predicate (1st order) logic as defined on p.56 and applied in chapter 33 of the A Treatise on Probability on pp.405-425. Keywords: Boolean relational, propositional logic; mathematical, formal, symbolic logic; objective, logical, probability relation; related versus unrelated propositions.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13944086
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Institutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Keynes's A Treatise on Probability is based on Boole's formal, mathematical, symbolic logic: Keynes was a formalist and logicist

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Economic Theory and Institutions
article

Keynes's A Treatise on Probability is based on Boole's formal, mathematical, symbolic logic: Keynes was a formalist and logicist

article en

Abstract

Abstract J M Keynes’s work in his A Treatise on Probability (1921) is based on the formal application of Boole’s relational, propositional logic and interval valued probability as presented in his The Laws of Thought (1854). Keynes then based his A Treatise on Money and General Theory on his work in Part II of the A Treatise on Probability as presented in Chapters X through XVII. This work is the basis for Keynes’s comments on mathematical and statistical methods and application in chapters 6,7 and 8 of Volume I of his 1930 A Treatise on Money and chapters 4 ,12 and 17 of the General Theory on using approximation, inexact measurement and reasonable calculation as opposed to precise ,exact, unreasonable mathematical expectations. Keynes’s clear statements in his Treatise on Probability about the nature of his technical work can only lead to the following conclusion -Keynes was a formalist and a logicist .All existing orthodox and heterodox “interpretations” of Keynes’s works are attempts by economists to reinterpret Keynes’s work ,so as to try to fit him into some version of either Benthamite utilitarianism (precise probability and precise utility a la James Tobin,1958) or a nihilist position(Joan Robinson ,G L S Shackle ,T. Lawson ,Post Keynesians ,Institutionalists). Keynes’s position is so clearly defined and presented by him in his A Treatise on Probability that the only conclusion possible is that both orthodox and heterodox economists have never read Keynes’s A Treatise on Probability ,except possibly for small , scattered bits and pieces cobbled together in a confused and confusing manner .The justification for this decision not to read the A treatise on Probability is based on the false claim that F P Ramsey had shown that Keynes’s formal, Boolean, relational , propositional logic was erroneous .Accepting Ramsey’s false claims thus made it impossible for economists to see that the underlying foundations of the A Treatise on Money and General Theory are built on the formal ,mathematical analysis presented in Part II of Keynes’s A treatise on Probability. Keynes later extended his propositional logic to include an introductory use of predicate (1st order) logic as defined on p.56 and applied in chapter 33 of the A Treatise on Probability on pp.405-425. Keywords: Boolean relational, propositional logic; mathematical, formal, symbolic logic; objective, logical, probability relation; related versus unrelated propositions.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Economic Theory and Institutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.