Ethicizing Military AI: Norm and Ethics in the Domain of Military AI

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming the defense sector by automating administrative tasks, enhancing strategic decision-making, and enabling autonomous weapon systems. However, its rapid adoption raises ethical concerns, including algorithmic bias, discrimination, and privacy violations, which are particularly critical in military applications. Incidents such as Google’s Project Maven and the boycott of AI-based military research at KAIST highlight growing ethical debates on AI in warfare.While various governments and organizations have proposed AI ethics guidelines, there is no universally accepted framework for military AI. The United States remains the only country with formal AI ethics principles for defense, while other nations, including South Korea, are still developing strategies.This study proposes a comprehensive ethical framework for military AI, ensuring legitimacy, accountability, and compliance with international laws. By analyzing existing AI ethics guidelines and assessing legal and ethical challenges, the study identifies key principles for responsible AI deployment in defense. The findings contribute to establishing global AI governance standards, positioning South Korea as a leader in ethical military AI development.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15074640
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethicizing Military AI: Norm and Ethics in the Domain of Military AI

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Ethicizing Military AI: Norm and Ethics in the Domain of Military AI

article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming the defense sector by automating administrative tasks, enhancing strategic decision-making, and enabling autonomous weapon systems. However, its rapid adoption raises ethical concerns, including algorithmic bias, discrimination, and privacy violations, which are particularly critical in military applications. Incidents such as Google’s Project Maven and the boycott of AI-based military research at KAIST highlight growing ethical debates on AI in warfare.While various governments and organizations have proposed AI ethics guidelines, there is no universally accepted framework for military AI. The United States remains the only country with formal AI ethics principles for defense, while other nations, including South Korea, are still developing strategies.This study proposes a comprehensive ethical framework for military AI, ensuring legitimacy, accountability, and compliance with international laws. By analyzing existing AI ethics guidelines and assessing legal and ethical challenges, the study identifies key principles for responsible AI deployment in defense. The findings contribute to establishing global AI governance standards, positioning South Korea as a leader in ethical military AI development.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.