Colonialism, Subjectivity, and Psychology in Latin America

The present article critically addresses the colonial character of the dominant psychological approaches to subjective experience in the Latin American context. These approaches are described as imbued with objectivism, dualism, individualism, and disciplinaryism, and are compared with Mesoamerican indigenous conceptions of subjectivity. It is assumed that what we usually call “psychology” is a cultural–historical manifestation of European capitalist modernity that was introduced in America by colonization. This assumption allows a problematization of the decolonial psychological project by suggesting that decolonization demands a break with psychology. Although decolonization is always unfinished and the colonial–postcolonial condition makes subjective experience always already psychologized, subjectivity is also always still resistant to its psychologization for the same reason that it still resists its complete Europeanization. Instead of the notions of hybridism and cultural miscegenation, the article asserts a conflictive coexistence of the colonizing and the colonized in the subjective sphere of Latin American societies and stresses the need to give an anticolonial and, inevitably, antipsychological orientation to decolonial and postcolonial perspectives in psychology.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14542479
Primary Topic
Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Colonialism, Subjectivity, and Psychology in Latin America

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
article

Colonialism, Subjectivity, and Psychology in Latin America

article en

Abstract

The present article critically addresses the colonial character of the dominant psychological approaches to subjective experience in the Latin American context. These approaches are described as imbued with objectivism, dualism, individualism, and disciplinaryism, and are compared with Mesoamerican indigenous conceptions of subjectivity. It is assumed that what we usually call “psychology” is a cultural–historical manifestation of European capitalist modernity that was introduced in America by colonization. This assumption allows a problematization of the decolonial psychological project by suggesting that decolonization demands a break with psychology. Although decolonization is always unfinished and the colonial–postcolonial condition makes subjective experience always already psychologized, subjectivity is also always still resistant to its psychologization for the same reason that it still resists its complete Europeanization. Instead of the notions of hybridism and cultural miscegenation, the article asserts a conflictive coexistence of the colonizing and the colonized in the subjective sphere of Latin American societies and stresses the need to give an anticolonial and, inevitably, antipsychological orientation to decolonial and postcolonial perspectives in psychology.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.