Comparison of Visual Place Recognition Methods for UAV Imagery

In many real world applications (natural disaster management, urban development, infrastructure inspection) Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) perform flights on different times, for scene image acquisition. Visual Place Recognition (VPR) methods can match newly acquired images with older ones, when the new and/or the old ones are not georeferenced. Most VPR solutions are based on image retrieval, where a query image scene is visually compared with that of many related images in a database, and the most relevant ones are retrieved. Deep learning-based VPR performance relies a lot on image dataset acquisition conditions, e.g. structured/unstructured scene visualization, single/multi-view image acquisition, illumination variations, or on-road/aerial view. Most of VPR methods are trained and tested on on-road views. This paper addresses the issue of image retrieval performance when large image databases are employed. To this end, we perform a comparison of some state of the art VPR methods on UAV image datasets, where the amount of database images is scaled, examine how well they generalize, and expand on some dataset creation gaps for this task.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15211726
Primary Topic
Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Visual Place Recognition Methods for UAV Imagery

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
article

Comparison of Visual Place Recognition Methods for UAV Imagery

article en

Abstract

In many real world applications (natural disaster management, urban development, infrastructure inspection) Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) perform flights on different times, for scene image acquisition. Visual Place Recognition (VPR) methods can match newly acquired images with older ones, when the new and/or the old ones are not georeferenced. Most VPR solutions are based on image retrieval, where a query image scene is visually compared with that of many related images in a database, and the most relevant ones are retrieved. Deep learning-based VPR performance relies a lot on image dataset acquisition conditions, e.g. structured/unstructured scene visualization, single/multi-view image acquisition, illumination variations, or on-road/aerial view. Most of VPR methods are trained and tested on on-road views. This paper addresses the issue of image retrieval performance when large image databases are employed. To this end, we perform a comparison of some state of the art VPR methods on UAV image datasets, where the amount of database images is scaled, examine how well they generalize, and expand on some dataset creation gaps for this task.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Visual Place Recognition Methods for UAV Imagery · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS