Traditional Institutions and Conflict Resolution in Nigeria: A Social Work Analysis

Traditional institutions in African societies and elsewhere are known to hold sacred peacemaking processes from historical antecedence before the disruption by colonial administration that introduced adjudication and arbitration, but which is often deemed the converse of traditional methods of conflict resolution. Contemporary patterns of conflict resolution are rather flawed in dealing with the challenges posed by modern conflict in Nigeria. This paper therefore examines the role of traditional institutions in conflict resolution in Nigeria from a social work perspective. Data was generated from secondary sources only. The study was anchored in system theory of Ludwig Bertalanffy (1956). The study revealed that the traditional conflict resolution method as practiced in Nigeria is better than the modern adjudicative method of conflict resolution, because it is faster and non-adversarial. The study recommends among other things a reversal to traditional methods of conflict management and resolution, because it is friendlier, faster, cheaper and devoid of post conflict resolution animosity.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13823154
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational, Social, and Political Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Traditional Institutions and Conflict Resolution in Nigeria: A Social Work Analysis

1 citations
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Educational, Social, and Political Issues
1.13
article

Traditional Institutions and Conflict Resolution in Nigeria: A Social Work Analysis

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Traditional institutions in African societies and elsewhere are known to hold sacred peacemaking processes from historical antecedence before the disruption by colonial administration that introduced adjudication and arbitration, but which is often deemed the converse of traditional methods of conflict resolution. Contemporary patterns of conflict resolution are rather flawed in dealing with the challenges posed by modern conflict in Nigeria. This paper therefore examines the role of traditional institutions in conflict resolution in Nigeria from a social work perspective. Data was generated from secondary sources only. The study was anchored in system theory of Ludwig Bertalanffy (1956). The study revealed that the traditional conflict resolution method as practiced in Nigeria is better than the modern adjudicative method of conflict resolution, because it is faster and non-adversarial. The study recommends among other things a reversal to traditional methods of conflict management and resolution, because it is friendlier, faster, cheaper and devoid of post conflict resolution animosity.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Educational, Social, and Political Issues
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Traditional Institutions and Conflict Resolution in Nigeria: A Social Work Analysis · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS