GENDER MAINSTREAMING LANDSCAPE OF DepEd DISTRICT OF SAN MATEO, ISABELA

The study aimed to assess the current level of gender mainstreaming in the DepEd District of San Mateo, Isabela, focusing on policy, people, enabling mechanisms, and programs, activities, and projects (PAPs). Using a descriptive-evaluative research design, the research employed both quantitative and qualitative methods, gathering data through surveys and structured interviews with stakeholders. The Gender Mainstreaming Evaluation Framework (GMEF) provided a basis for quantifying gender integration across identified dimensions. Descriptive statistics summarized the GMEF scores, while thematic analysis of interview data enriched quantitative findings with insights into the experiences and challenges faced by stakeholders. Results revealed that while foundational structures for gender mainstreaming exist, areas like policy enhancement and increased GAD (Gender and Development) expertise are needed for deeper institutional integration. The study concluded with recommendations to strengthen gender mainstreaming efforts, with the aim to create a more inclusive and equitable educational environment that aligns with national and international gender equality goals.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14233443
Primary Topic
International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GENDER MAINSTREAMING LANDSCAPE OF DepEd DISTRICT OF SAN MATEO, ISABELA

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
article

GENDER MAINSTREAMING LANDSCAPE OF DepEd DISTRICT OF SAN MATEO, ISABELA

article en

Abstract

The study aimed to assess the current level of gender mainstreaming in the DepEd District of San Mateo, Isabela, focusing on policy, people, enabling mechanisms, and programs, activities, and projects (PAPs). Using a descriptive-evaluative research design, the research employed both quantitative and qualitative methods, gathering data through surveys and structured interviews with stakeholders. The Gender Mainstreaming Evaluation Framework (GMEF) provided a basis for quantifying gender integration across identified dimensions. Descriptive statistics summarized the GMEF scores, while thematic analysis of interview data enriched quantitative findings with insights into the experiences and challenges faced by stakeholders. Results revealed that while foundational structures for gender mainstreaming exist, areas like policy enhancement and increased GAD (Gender and Development) expertise are needed for deeper institutional integration. The study concluded with recommendations to strengthen gender mainstreaming efforts, with the aim to create a more inclusive and equitable educational environment that aligns with national and international gender equality goals.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.