The Efficacy of Duosomic® Iron over Standard Iron Formulations in IDA Management: A Randomized Controlled Comparative Clinical Study

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a common condition worldwide, and oral iron therapies have varied efficacy and safety profiles. This study aims to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of DUOSOMIC® Iron, Iron Sucrose Ester, and Ferrous Bisglycinate Chelate in correcting anemia, replenishing iron stores, and enhancing erythropoiesis. Methods: This paper shows results from three clinical studies: a randomized controlled trial study on DUOSOMIC® Iron, an Iron Sucrose Ester, and a Ferrous Bisglycinate Chelate. A total of 206 patients were involved. The primary endpoints were changes in hemoglobin levels, serum ferritin, and transferrin saturation. Results: DUOSOMIC® Iron resulted in significant improvements, including a mean hemoglobin increase of 5.92 g/dL for men and 4.59 g/dL for women. Serum ferritin increased by 92.17 µg/L, and transferrin saturation rose to 25%. Iron Sucrose Ester and Ferrous Bisglycinate Chelate showed moderate efficacy but required higher doses and longer treatment durations to achieve comparable results. Conclusion: DUOSOMIC® Iron demonstrated superior efficacy and safety, making it an effective treatment option for IDA

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13921418
Primary Topic
Iron Metabolism and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Efficacy of Duosomic® Iron over Standard Iron Formulations in IDA Management: A Randomized Controlled Comparative Clinical Study

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Iron Metabolism and Disorders
article

The Efficacy of Duosomic® Iron over Standard Iron Formulations in IDA Management: A Randomized Controlled Comparative Clinical Study

article en

Abstract

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a common condition worldwide, and oral iron therapies have varied efficacy and safety profiles. This study aims to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of DUOSOMIC® Iron, Iron Sucrose Ester, and Ferrous Bisglycinate Chelate in correcting anemia, replenishing iron stores, and enhancing erythropoiesis. Methods: This paper shows results from three clinical studies: a randomized controlled trial study on DUOSOMIC® Iron, an Iron Sucrose Ester, and a Ferrous Bisglycinate Chelate. A total of 206 patients were involved. The primary endpoints were changes in hemoglobin levels, serum ferritin, and transferrin saturation. Results: DUOSOMIC® Iron resulted in significant improvements, including a mean hemoglobin increase of 5.92 g/dL for men and 4.59 g/dL for women. Serum ferritin increased by 92.17 µg/L, and transferrin saturation rose to 25%. Iron Sucrose Ester and Ferrous Bisglycinate Chelate showed moderate efficacy but required higher doses and longer treatment durations to achieve comparable results. Conclusion: DUOSOMIC® Iron demonstrated superior efficacy and safety, making it an effective treatment option for IDA

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Egypt Nanotechnology Center (EG), Nord University (NO)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Iron Metabolism and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Efficacy of Duosomic® Iron over Standard Iron Formulations in IDA Management: A Randomized Controlled Comparative Clinical Study · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS