Building a Secure and Productive TRE: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Proxy PyPI

How can we achieve the right balance between security and productivity in research with sensitive data? The world is awash with data that can be used to provide insights that benefit society. However, much of this data is effectively unavailable for use by researchers due to privacy concerns. Unlocking access to this data requires building trust with the custodians who safeguard the data and with society as a whole. Traditionally, this trust has been secured by a "security maximalist" approach, either by design, or through excessive caution. Here, we share the lessons of 6 years of working with over 50 data providers to support access to sensitive data for research under a flexible framework of information governance and technical controls.We've built an open source information governance framework and reproducibly-deployable, cloud-based Trusted Research Environment (TRE). In this talk we discuss:- Making governance and security controls explainable to data risk holders- Using a tiered risk model to help achieve shared consensus- Supporting researcher effectiveness- Where security and usability _don't_ end up being a trade-off- The things you *don't* need in a locked-down environment- The value of sharing governance models and TRE design choices openly- The power of collaborating as a community to address shared challengesDrawing on our experience, we will set out what a good balance between competing concerns looks like, what we do differently to other TREs, and how you can get involved with both our work and the wider TRE community. A recording of this session is available on YouTube: https://youtu.be/NIxLxSIoAkw

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14290397
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building a Secure and Productive TRE: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Proxy PyPI

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Research Data Management Practices
article

Building a Secure and Productive TRE: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Proxy PyPI

article en

Abstract

How can we achieve the right balance between security and productivity in research with sensitive data? The world is awash with data that can be used to provide insights that benefit society. However, much of this data is effectively unavailable for use by researchers due to privacy concerns. Unlocking access to this data requires building trust with the custodians who safeguard the data and with society as a whole. Traditionally, this trust has been secured by a "security maximalist" approach, either by design, or through excessive caution. Here, we share the lessons of 6 years of working with over 50 data providers to support access to sensitive data for research under a flexible framework of information governance and technical controls.We've built an open source information governance framework and reproducibly-deployable, cloud-based Trusted Research Environment (TRE). In this talk we discuss:- Making governance and security controls explainable to data risk holders- Using a tiered risk model to help achieve shared consensus- Supporting researcher effectiveness- Where security and usability _don't_ end up being a trade-off- The things you *don't* need in a locked-down environment- The value of sharing governance models and TRE design choices openly- The power of collaborating as a community to address shared challengesDrawing on our experience, we will set out what a good balance between competing concerns looks like, what we do differently to other TREs, and how you can get involved with both our work and the wider TRE community. A recording of this session is available on YouTube: https://youtu.be/NIxLxSIoAkw

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
GTx (United States) (US), Weatherford College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Research Data Management Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.