Predictive Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation by Immersion A- Scan Biometry and Contact A- Scan Biometry: A Comparative Study

Background: A-scan ultrasound biometry (A-scan biometry/ A-scan)is mainly used to determine the axial length of the eye with the help of an ultrasound device. Axial length of eye is an important parameter to calculate Intra-ocular lens (IOL) power prior to cataract surgery. Different formulae to calculate the IOL power need axial length value along with keratometry value (calculated using a keratometer). Sometimes, the corneal compression caused during the A-scan measurement gives wrong values of the axial length. The objective of the present study was to compare accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation by immersion A-scan biometry and contact A-scan biometry in a tertiary care centre. Material and Methods: The present hospital based comparative observational study was conducted at Department of Ophthalmology from July 2024 to September 2024.A total of 100 consecutive patients who underwent phacoemulsification and IOL implantation were included in the study. Informed written consent was taken from the participants of the study. Patients were divided into Group A as immersion group and Group B as Contact A-scan group with 50 patients each. Data entry and data analysis was done using MS Excel and epi info version 7. Results: Most of the patients were females in Group A (70%) and Group B (62%) with no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). The mean axial length in group A and Group B was23.07 and 22.65with statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The mean IOL power in group A and Group B was20.37 and 21.21respectively with statistically significant difference (P<0.05). Conclusion: The present study concludes that the immersion technique had better repeatability compared to Contact A-scan for intraocular lens power calculation.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14475733
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation by Immersion A- Scan Biometry and Contact A- Scan Biometry: A Comparative Study

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Predictive Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation by Immersion A- Scan Biometry and Contact A- Scan Biometry: A Comparative Study

article en

Abstract

Background: A-scan ultrasound biometry (A-scan biometry/ A-scan)is mainly used to determine the axial length of the eye with the help of an ultrasound device. Axial length of eye is an important parameter to calculate Intra-ocular lens (IOL) power prior to cataract surgery. Different formulae to calculate the IOL power need axial length value along with keratometry value (calculated using a keratometer). Sometimes, the corneal compression caused during the A-scan measurement gives wrong values of the axial length. The objective of the present study was to compare accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation by immersion A-scan biometry and contact A-scan biometry in a tertiary care centre. Material and Methods: The present hospital based comparative observational study was conducted at Department of Ophthalmology from July 2024 to September 2024.A total of 100 consecutive patients who underwent phacoemulsification and IOL implantation were included in the study. Informed written consent was taken from the participants of the study. Patients were divided into Group A as immersion group and Group B as Contact A-scan group with 50 patients each. Data entry and data analysis was done using MS Excel and epi info version 7. Results: Most of the patients were females in Group A (70%) and Group B (62%) with no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). The mean axial length in group A and Group B was23.07 and 22.65with statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The mean IOL power in group A and Group B was20.37 and 21.21respectively with statistically significant difference (P<0.05). Conclusion: The present study concludes that the immersion technique had better repeatability compared to Contact A-scan for intraocular lens power calculation.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Predictive Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation by Immersion A- Scan Biometry and Contact A- Scan Biometry: A Comparative Study · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS