Serranillus Barr 1995

Serranillus Barr, 1995: 246 Adult diagnosis. Males of Serranillus are easily distinguished from Anillinus by the “ serrate ” modification of the last abdominal ventrite, which bears three protruding blunt lobes (Figs 15 B, 18 B, 19 B), and by the greatly reduced and inconspicuous right paramere which lacks setae (Figs 15 D, 19 D). The last abdominal ventrite of male Serranillus also has large lateral extensions internally, visible when the abdomen is removed and cleared (Fig. 20 C). The dorsal body surfaces of Serranillus are typically more setose than members of Anillinus, particularly the elytra (Sokolov et al. 2004), but members of some Anillinus species are similarly setose (Sokolov 2021). The pair of median setae on the mentum are on the mentum tooth itself in all specimens of Serranillus examined by us (Fig. 11 A), while in Anillinus they are typically basad the tooth (Fig. 11 B). Both mandibles in Serranillus possess a retinacular tooth near the base (Fig. 11 C), while in Anillinus only the right mandible has a tooth (Fig. 11 D). In addition to the reduced size of the right paramere, the right basal lobe of the median lobe of the aedeagus in Serranillus is reduced to a thin strip. The internal sac of the aedeagus in all species also contains a coiled sclerite on the left side, which is absent in Anillinus. The female spermathecae of Serranillus species are relatively small and have a stem that is nearly straight before the curved apex (Fig. 21 S, T). The spermathecae are similar in shape to those of A. albrittonorum and A jancae, but the stem in those species is more slender and curved outward from the base (Fig. 21 N). Larval diagnosis. Differing from the single known late-instar Anillinus larva by mandibles with terebrae lacking serrations (Fig. 14 B) and stipes of maxilla with setae of group gMX unevenly placed (Fig. 14 D). Diversity. Four previously described species, one species described as new below, and at least 10 undescribed species (Suppl. material 3). Distribution. Few occurrence records have been previously published for Serranillus. The type locality of Serranillus dunavani (Jeannel) is Sassafras Mountain, near Rocky Bottom in Pickens Co, South Carolina, and the species has also been reported from Great Smoky Mountains National Park (Sokolov and Carlton 2008, 2010). Barr (1995) described Serranillus jeanneli from Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory in Macon County, North Carolina, and stated the range extended from the Great Balsam Mountains in western North Carolina to northern Georgia, but gave no further details. He also mentioned in passing the existence of additional species in Cloudland Canyon (Dade County, GA) and the Piedmont of North Carolina and South Carolina. The Cloudland Canyon species is currently interpreted as Serranillus magnus (Zaballos & Mateu, 1997), described from material mislabeled as from Brazil (Sokolov and Carlton 2012). Sokolov and Carlton (2008) described Serranillus septentrionis from southwestern Virginia and cite a record of S. jeanneli from White County, Georgia. Museum records and personal collecting provide a more complete view of the range of the genus (Fig. 1 A). Collectively, the genus occupies most of the southern Appalachians from NC to northwest GA, with disjunct occurrences in southwestern VA, the Black and Bald Mountains of NC and TN, central and western Alabama, and the Cumberland Plateau of northern Tennessee. A pair of female Serranillus in the CMNH collection bearing Connecticut locality labels is mislabeled according to the collector (S. Peck, pers. comm., July 2019).

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13270370
Primary Topic
Crustacean biology and ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Serranillus Barr 1995

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Crustacean biology and ecology
article

Serranillus Barr 1995

article en

Abstract

Serranillus Barr, 1995: 246 Adult diagnosis. Males of Serranillus are easily distinguished from Anillinus by the “ serrate ” modification of the last abdominal ventrite, which bears three protruding blunt lobes (Figs 15 B, 18 B, 19 B), and by the greatly reduced and inconspicuous right paramere which lacks setae (Figs 15 D, 19 D). The last abdominal ventrite of male Serranillus also has large lateral extensions internally, visible when the abdomen is removed and cleared (Fig. 20 C). The dorsal body surfaces of Serranillus are typically more setose than members of Anillinus, particularly the elytra (Sokolov et al. 2004), but members of some Anillinus species are similarly setose (Sokolov 2021). The pair of median setae on the mentum are on the mentum tooth itself in all specimens of Serranillus examined by us (Fig. 11 A), while in Anillinus they are typically basad the tooth (Fig. 11 B). Both mandibles in Serranillus possess a retinacular tooth near the base (Fig. 11 C), while in Anillinus only the right mandible has a tooth (Fig. 11 D). In addition to the reduced size of the right paramere, the right basal lobe of the median lobe of the aedeagus in Serranillus is reduced to a thin strip. The internal sac of the aedeagus in all species also contains a coiled sclerite on the left side, which is absent in Anillinus. The female spermathecae of Serranillus species are relatively small and have a stem that is nearly straight before the curved apex (Fig. 21 S, T). The spermathecae are similar in shape to those of A. albrittonorum and A jancae, but the stem in those species is more slender and curved outward from the base (Fig. 21 N). Larval diagnosis. Differing from the single known late-instar Anillinus larva by mandibles with terebrae lacking serrations (Fig. 14 B) and stipes of maxilla with setae of group gMX unevenly placed (Fig. 14 D). Diversity. Four previously described species, one species described as new below, and at least 10 undescribed species (Suppl. material 3). Distribution. Few occurrence records have been previously published for Serranillus. The type locality of Serranillus dunavani (Jeannel) is Sassafras Mountain, near Rocky Bottom in Pickens Co, South Carolina, and the species has also been reported from Great Smoky Mountains National Park (Sokolov and Carlton 2008, 2010). Barr (1995) described Serranillus jeanneli from Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory in Macon County, North Carolina, and stated the range extended from the Great Balsam Mountains in western North Carolina to northern Georgia, but gave no further details. He also mentioned in passing the existence of additional species in Cloudland Canyon (Dade County, GA) and the Piedmont of North Carolina and South Carolina. The Cloudland Canyon species is currently interpreted as Serranillus magnus (Zaballos & Mateu, 1997), described from material mislabeled as from Brazil (Sokolov and Carlton 2012). Sokolov and Carlton (2008) described Serranillus septentrionis from southwestern Virginia and cite a record of S. jeanneli from White County, Georgia. Museum records and personal collecting provide a more complete view of the range of the genus (Fig. 1 A). Collectively, the genus occupies most of the southern Appalachians from NC to northwest GA, with disjunct occurrences in southwestern VA, the Black and Bald Mountains of NC and TN, central and western Alabama, and the Cumberland Plateau of northern Tennessee. A pair of female Serranillus in the CMNH collection bearing Connecticut locality labels is mislabeled according to the collector (S. Peck, pers. comm., July 2019).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Clemson University (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Crustacean biology and ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.